Tag Archive: Corruption


Is this not getting crazy or what? A letter published on-line states that Nunes (R) believes that Adam the shifty Schiff (D) actually needs a little time on the office couch, well maybe a lot of time.

I have to say if the shoe was on the other foot I would still feel the same. Corruption is corruption. Dem’s or Repub’s makes no difference, I’m neither.

The Letter: As far as I can tell this has not been a verified source.

Dear Chairman Schiff:
As you are aware, on December 9, 2019, U.S. Department of Justice Inspector General (IG) Michael Horowitz published the results of his investigation of the FISA warrant and renewals obtained by the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to spy on Trump campaign associate Carter Page. The IG’s findings of pervasive, major abuses by the FBI dramatically contradict the assertions of your memo released on February 24, 2018, in which you claimed, “FBI and DOJ officials did not ‘abuse’ the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process, omit material information, or subvert this vital tool to spy on the Trump Campaign.”
After publishing false conclusions of such enormity on a topic directly within this committee’s oversight responsibilities, it is clear you are in need of rehabilitation, and I hope this letter will serve as the first step in that vital process.
Outlining every false claim from your memo would require an extremely long letter, so I will limit my summary to a few highlights. In your memo you made the following assertions:
• FBI and DOJ officials did not omit material information from the FISA warrant.
• The DOJ “made only narrow use of information from [Christopher] Steele’s sources about Page’s specific activities in 2016.”
• In subsequent FISA renewals, DOJ provided additional information that corroborated Steele’s reporting.
• The Page FISA warrant allowed the FBI to collect “valuable intelligence.”
• “Far from “omitting’ material facts about Steele, as the Majority claims. DOJ repeatedly informed the Court about Steele’s background, credibility, and potential bias.”
• The FI31 conducted a “rigorous process” to vet Steele’s allegations, and the Page FISA application explained the FBI’s reasonable basis for finding Steele credible.
• Steele’s prior reporting was used in criminal proceedings.
The IG report has exposed all these declarations as false. Despite your denial of any problems with the FISA warrant, the 16 found:
• Information provided by Christopher Steele played a “central and essential role” in the decision to seek a FISA warrant on Carter Page.
• There were seventeen “significant errors or omissions” in the FISA application and renewals, and the IG did not get satisfactory explanations for them.
• The Crossfire Hurricane team failed to inform the DOJ of “significant information”, and “much of that information was inconsistent with, or undercut” assertions in the FISA applications.
• The FBI relied solely on Steele information for its assertions about Page’s alleged coordination with Russians to hack the 2016 elections.
• The applications omitted information provided to the FBI about Page’s operational contact with another U.S. government agency and the agency’s positive assessment of him. In fact, an FBI official altered an email stating that Page was a source for another government agency in order to have it read the opposite—that he was “not a source.”
• FBI Director James Conley and Deputy Director Andy McCabe sought to include Steele’s reporting in the Intelligence Community Assessment even though the CIA dismissed the Steele information as `Internet rumor.”
• In FBI interviews, Steele’s own sources contradicted information from Steele that was used in the FISA applications.
• The significance of Steele’s prior reporting was ‘-overstated.”
• None of the Steele reporting on Caner Page used in the FISA applications could be corroborated, and some of it contradicted other information in the FBI’s possession.
• The FBI omitted information about Steele’s bias provided by DOJ official Bruce Ohr.
• The applications omitted exculpatory statements by Page and others.
• The FBI failed to reveal in the applications that the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary’ Clinton campaign were receiving and/or funding Steele’s work through Fusion UPS.
• Overall, the Inspector General found, “That so many basic and fundamental errors were made by three separate, hand-picked teams on one of the most sensitive FBI investigations that was briefed to the highest levels within the FBI, and that FBI officials expected would eventually be subjected to close scrutiny, raised significant questions regarding the FBI chain of command’s management and supervision of the FISA process… In our view, this was a failure of not only the operational team, but also of the managers and supervisors, including senior officials, in the chain of command.” Indeed, the problems are so severe that the Inspector General has initiated an audit to further investigate FBI’s compliance with Woods Procedures in FISA applications.
As you know, your misguided validation of the FISA warrant was part of a years-long pattern in which you touted Christopher Steele’s credentials and reliability. For example, during this committee’s March 20, 2017 open hearing, you claimed Steele “is reportedly held in high regard by U.S. Intelligence.” and proceeded to read into the congressional record numerous conspiracy theories proffered by Steele, all of which are false. These included:
• Carter Page had a secret meeting with Rosneft CEO Igor Sechin.
• Sechin offered Page a brokerage fee involving the sale of 19 percent of Rosneft.
• Russians offered the Trump campaign dirt on Hillary Clinton in exchange for the Trump administration adopting policies favorable to Russia
• Paul Manafort chose Page to act as a go-between for the Trump campaign and Russia.
As is clear from the 16 report, Carter Page was the victim of a smear campaign that was funded by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign and was implemented by Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS. The FBI used these false allegations to obtain a warrant to spy on Page, a gross violation of an American citizen’s civil liberties. Your direct participation in the smear campaign against Page is extremely concerning. considering you are chairman of the committee responsible for uncovering precisely these sorts of abuses by the Intelligence Community. Instead of joining committee Republicans in exposing these abuses, however, you excused them. And by supporting the agencies’ stonewalling of our attempts to gather information on this affair, you helped cover up this misconduct.
I am particularly concerned by the press release you issued after the release of the IG report. I applaud you for acknowledging that the report identified “issues and errors” and “potential misconduct” connected to the FISA warrant. This acknowledgement, though dramatically downplaying the scale of the abuse the IG uncovered, could be a valuable first step – a baby step, but a step nonetheless – in your rehabilitation. Nevertheless, in your statement you expressed full faith in FBI Director Christopher Wray’s promise to address the problem: demanded that the implementation of reforms be confined to “career officials, away from the political arena;” and denounced Attorney General Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham for expressing concerns about these matters.
This makes it clear your rehabilitation will be a long, arduous process. As previously noted, this committee is responsible for overseeing the Intelligence Community and exposing abuses. Yet when the IG identified gross abuses in our jurisdiction, you expressed full faith in the agencies we’re supposed to be vigilantly monitoring. and you rejected any oversight whatsoever of their supposed clean-up efforts. If agencies with a documented, severe abuse problem should be trusted to police themselves, then it’s fair to ask why this committee even exists and what we’re supposed to be doing, if anything, aside from being exploited by you as a launching pad to impeach the president for issues that have no intelligence component at all.
As part of your rehabilitation, it’s crucial that you admit you have a problem – you are hijacking the Intelligence Committee for political purposes while excusing and covering up intelligence agency abuses. The next step will be to convene a hearing with IG Horowitz, as the Senate Judiciary Committee has done and the Senate Homeland Security Committee will do next week.
I understand taking action on this issue will be difficult for you, as it will be an implicit acknowledgment that you were wrong to deny these abuses and that you were complicit in the violation of an American’s civil liberties. I also understand such an acknowledgement is made even more difficult by the fact that you’ve already been discredited by your years-long false claim that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to hack the 2016 presidential election.
Nevertheless, I refuse to believe you are beyond redemption. I invite you to work closely with me on your rehabilitation program, and look forward to your scheduling a committee hearing with IG Horowitz at the nearest opportunity.

Why the Dem/RINO gang really want to impeach Trump

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 05: U.S. President Donald Trump listens to comments during a luncheon with representatives of the United Nations Security Council, in the Cabinet Room at the White House on December 5, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Friday, December 06, 2019

Read this brief dissertation with some humor
Typos, incorrect spelling is not the deficiency of author, censure the keyboard.

Summary:

During the 2016 election promotion advertisement process the big bad orange man avowed a long list of political brands i.e.

Crazy Creepy sleepy feely Joe Biden, crooked lyin leaking bleach bit Hillary, slippery shady slimy Comey, sneaky snooty leaking Dianne Feinstein, fat fetid farter Jerry Nadler, foul mouthed vulgar Omar, high crime nervous over medicated Nancy, wacky wicked Jacky, crazy lazy it’s free commie Bernie, Pocahontas wampum teepee Warren, and of course sleazy shifty slim ball Schiff, a worthy possibility this is the name printed on his passport. I’m sure you all can cogitate supplementary offerings to this diminutive tribal list.

Where do I purchase Congressional “Garbage Pail Kids” trading cards? BTW They never did publish the “pickled baby in a jar”. Maybe a little over the edge, although it could have become an excellect anti-abortion campiagn card. And when you get close to the edge, always be prepaed to fall safely.
I really had to mulnipulate the dials, pull and push levers, punch bottons and toggle multipule switche’s on my time machine for that one. Wow, Glad I’m back.

Anyway;
At this time he (Trump) has not relented with the derision. This unrestricted scoffing has caused offense to their (demrino’s) snowflake child like feelings while degrading their self chosen one character. Has anyone reading this not at one time or another in their life’s called a childhood or adult foe a sarcastic defaming name, your mother wears army boots, eats shit and barks at the moon. Let the one who has not sinned cast the first stone.

Of course the impeachment perpetrators would never admit to some sort of psychopathic self imposed derangement syndrome. Thus the demrino town hall criers and their hearyea-hearyea proclamation, Read all about it “we’ll get even with Trump for calling names” is their costly tax payer funded shriek to throw him in an impeachment jail process at all expense. What the Dem’s, the scam provokers were elected for, ran their political campaigns have been thrown out the with the bath water, baby and all with a brand new bar of soap including the washcloth. For them it’s full steam ahead no matter what our constituents want and demand. Perhaps like tax reform, prescription med cost reduction, fair trade deals, international human rights, Israel/Palestinian illegal settlement reform, Syria, Iran and fifty other endless wars, and the corporate Zog lobbyist rule of “For the People” elimination.

Even though there is no legal proof of high crimes and misdemeanors at this phase of the game, the so called hearings. Except maybe in their deteriorating Spanish iniquitous two cell minds. Two cells because they have one large and one tiny, conjecture is that the large malevolent cell rules the roost. A transgender walking Pelosi poultry, if that’s possible. What you say, half rooster half hen, can it screw itself and produce a ………

Conclusion:

Yup, Trump is a little rough and raged around the edges and may be somewhat linguistically challenged in PC discourse but, he wasn’t and still isn’t a career politician and hasn’t had the occasion for identity training at twisting the meaning of commonly used English words for character benefit, while confusing the public. “If you can’t convince them with brilliance, baffle them with bull shit”.

Whether you lean starboard, lean port or somewhere mid ship during this storm, still stands to reason this is a Barnum and Bailey see the orange snake man side show. Perhaps in the future, if we get one there will be a curious circus side show of a petrified Trump on display. Orange snake man is the most horrendously discussing living viper serpent with two legs on the planet. Possibly among all the ALF’s in all the galaxies. And you have to pay the barker for peoples Republic advocate splitting admission. It ain’t cheap folks.

Dam the torpedoes, full speed ahead, and don’t look back.

mike

Fires of Steel

As seen in the below pictures fire does not make a steel structure high-rise building crumble to the ground in a heap of debris and dust into its own footprint. Strange how some will believe what their told and not what’s right in front of their own eyes.

 

Fire Mandarin hotel Fire Maderin hotel after

Mandarin Hotel: During and after massive fire. Still standing

fire Winsor tower Madrid fire Winsor tower Madrid after

Windsor Hotel, Madrid: During and after Ragging fire. Still standing

Fire WTC 7 Fire WTC 7 after

WTC 7 on 9/11: Before and after small office fire. Need I say more?

Counting the Vote

During the next election remember this and don’t vote. Your vote doesn’t count anyway, it all boils down to the electoral vote. Do you trust the congress in the nation state of Washington dc? I think they have proven themselves not to listen to the will of their master, the people.

Get ready, this might be the big one. You know, the start of the one world currency bankster monopoly. I’m sure it’ll still be a money from nothing scam, more pieces of paper that in reality are worthless.

Listen to Ms. Hudes closely, what she is stating is outrageous and damming. With a big BUT, listen to what she says toward the end. Is she being allowed to say all this to promote a one world currency? I don’t know but, the powers that be have been perpetrating this money junkie scam for decades. What you think you have and what you really have are two different things. I’m sure your all well aware if you don’t pay your taxes to the strong arm of the fed (irs) they will come and take everything you paid to much for as a banker slave.

The cost for farming, manufacturing and services should have declined due to technology which saves time and money but, have increased enormously since 1913. The value of the USD has declined due to manipulation of the system. The dollar was once worth a dollar in precious metal, today its worth about 2 cents in the same metals, thanks to the federal reserve act. Where has all this wealth vanished too? Wait a sec, I’ll bet Leahy got some, he certainly knows the game by now.

At 1:45 she states who she gave this information to. Does the name Leahy ring a bell?

 

 

It amazes me that the people have been so bumbed down that they think anything the all powerful government and it’s 100’s of agencies do is good for the nation. IF they decided to reduce the population of north America by 30% would that be fine?

Q & A about the I-R-S

 

Given the scandals surrounding the IRS, which is nothing new I decided to drag this out of my archives. Originally this was a list of 31 questions; I’ve shortened the list to less pages due to length, this was lengthily and sort of still is.  Some of the answers have been shortened also. Many people are unaware the history and the illegality of this strong arm of the federal reserve.  

 

IRS under the looking glass

IRS under the looking glass

 

 

Questions and Answers about

the Internal Revenue Service

 

certified by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

 

Common Law Copyright

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

 1.               Is the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury?

Answer:  No.  The IRS is not an organization within the United States Department of the Treasury.  The U.S. Department of the Treasury was organized by statutes now codified in Title 31 of the United States Code, abbreviated “31 U.S.C.”  The only mention of the IRS anywhere in 31 U.S.C. §§ 301‑310 is an authorization for the President to appoint an Assistant General Counsel in the U.S. Department of the Treasury to be the Chief Counsel for the IRS.  See 31 U.S.C. 301(f)(2).

At footnote 23 in the case of Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979), the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that no organic Act for the IRS could be found, after they searched for such an Act all the way back to the Civil War, which ended in the year 1865 A.D.  The Guarantee Clause in the U.S. Constitution guarantees the Rule of Law to all Americans (we are to be governed by Law and not by arbitrary bureaucrats).  See Article IV, Section 4.  Since there was no organic Act creating it, IRS is not a lawful organization.

2.               If not an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury, then what exactly is the IRS?

Answer:  The IRS appears to be a collection agency working for foreign banks and operating out of Puerto Rico under color of the Federal Alcohol Administration (“FAA”).  But the FAA was promptly declared unconstitutional inside the 50 States by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of U.S. v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 287 (1935), because Prohibition had already been repealed.

In 1998, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit identified a second “Secretary of the Treasury” as a man by the name of Manual Díaz-Saldaña.  See the definitions of “Secretary” and “Secretary or his delegate” at 27 CFR 26.11 (formerly 27 CFR 250.11), and the published decision in Used Tire International, Inc. v. Manual Díaz-Saldaña, court docket number 97‑2348, September 11, 1998.  Both definitions mention Puerto Rico.

When all the evidence is examined objectively, IRS appears to be a money laundry, extortion racket, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 and 1961 et seq. (“RICO”).  Think of Puerto RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act);  in other words, it is an organized crime syndicate operating under false and fraudulent pretenses.  See also the Sherman Act and the Lanham Act.

3.               By what legal authority, if any, has the IRS established offices inside the 50 States of the Union?

Answer:  After much diligent research, several investigators have concluded that there is no known Act of Congress, nor any Executive Order, giving IRS lawful jurisdiction to operate within any of the 50 States of the Union.

Their presence within the 50 States appears to stem from certain Agreements on Coordination of Tax Administration (“ACTA”), which officials in those States have consummated with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.  A template for ACTA agreements can be found at the IRS Internet website and in the Supreme Law Library on the Internet.

However, those ACTA agreements are demonstrably fraudulent, for example, by expressly defining “IRS” as a lawful bureau within the U.S. Department of the Treasury.  (See Answer to Question 1 above.)  Moreover, those ACTA agreements also appear to violate State laws requiring competitive bidding before such a service contract can be awarded by a State government to any subcontractor.  There is no evidence to indicate that ACTA agreements were reached after competitive bidding processes;  on the contrary, the IRS is adamant about maintaining a monopoly syndicate.

4.               Can IRS legally show “Department of the Treasury” on their outgoing mail?

Answer:  No.  It is obvious that such deceptive nomenclature is intended to convey the false impression that IRS is a lawful bureau or department within the U.S. Department of the Treasury.  Federal laws prohibit the use of United States Mail for fraudulent purposes.  Every piece of U.S. Mail sent from IRS with “Department of the Treasury” in the return address, is one count of mail fraud.  See also 31 U.S.C. 333.

5.               Does the U.S. Department of Justice have power of attorney to represent the IRS in federal court?

Answer:  No.  Although the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) does have power of attorney to represent federal agencies before federal courts, the IRS is not an “agency” as that term is legally defined in the Freedom of Information Act or in the Administrative Procedures Act.  The governments of all federal Territories are expressly excluded from the definition of federal “agency” by Act of Congress.  See 5 U.S.C. 551(1)(C).

Since IRS is domiciled in Puerto Rico (RICO?), it is thereby excluded from the definition of federal agencies which can be represented by the DOJ.  The IRS Chief Counsel, appointed by the President under authority of 31 U.S.C. 301(f)(2), can appear, or appoint a delegate to appear in federal court on behalf of IRS and IRS employees.  Again, see the Answer to Question 1 above.  As far as powers of attorney are concerned, the chain of command begins with Congress, flows to the President, and then to the IRS Chief Counsel, and NOT to the U.S. Department of Justice.

You pay We play

You pay We play

6.               Were the so-called 14th and 16th amendments properly ratified?

Answer:  No.  Neither was properly ratified.  In the case of People v. Boxer (December 1992), docket number #S-030016, U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer fell totally silent in the face of an Application to the California Supreme Court by the People of California, for an ORDER compelling Senator Boxer to witness the material evidence against the so-called 16th amendment.

That so‑called “amendment” allegedly authorized federal income taxation, even though it contains no provision expressly repealing two Constitutional Clauses mandating that direct taxes must be apportioned.  The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court have both ruled that repeals by implication are not favored.  See Crawford Fitting Co. et al. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 442 (1987).

The material evidence in question was summarized in AFFIDAVIT’s that were properly executed and filed in that case.  Boxer fell totally silent, thus rendering those affidavits the “truth of the case.”  The so‑called 16th amendment has now been correctly identified as a major fraud upon the American People and the United States.  Major fraud against the United States is a serious federal offense.  See 18 U.S.C. 1031.

Similarly, the so-called 14th amendment was never properly ratified either.  In the case of Dyett v. Turner, 439 P.2d  266, 270 (1968), the Utah Supreme Court recited numerous historical facts proving, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that the so‑called 14th amendment was likewise a major fraud upon the American People.

Those facts, in many cases, were Acts of the several State Legislatures voting for or against that proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution.  The Supreme Law Library has a collection of references detailing this major fraud.

The U.S. Constitution requires that constitutional amendments be ratified by three-fourths of the several States.  As such, their Acts are governed by the Full Faith and Credit Clause in the U.S. Constitution.  See Article IV, Section 1.

Judging by the sheer amount of litigation its various sections have generated, particularly Section 1, the so‑called 14th amendment is one of the worst pieces of legislation ever written in American history.  The phrase “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” is properly understood to mean “subject to the municipal jurisdiction of Congress.”  (See Answer to Question 19 below.)

For this one reason alone, the Congressional Resolution proposing the so-called 14th amendment is provably vague and therefore unconstitutional.  See 14 Stat. 358-359, Joint Resolution No. 48, June 16, 1866.

7.               Where are the statutes that create a specific liability for federal income taxes?

Answer:  Section 1 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) contains no provisions creating a specific liability for taxes imposed by subtitle A.  Aside from the statutes which apply only to federal government employees, pursuant to the Public Salary Tax Act, the only other statutes that create a specific liability for federal income taxes are those itemized in the definition of “Withholding agent” at IRC section 7701(a)(16).  For example, see IRC section 1461.  A separate liability statute for “employment” taxes imposed by subtitle C is found at IRC section 3403.

After a worker authorizes a payroll officer to withhold taxes, typically by completing Form W‑4, the payroll officer then becomes a withholding agent who is legally and specifically liable for payment of all taxes withheld from that worker’s paycheck.  Until such time as those taxes are paid in full into the Treasury of the United States, the withholding agent is the only party who is legally liable for those taxes, not the worker.  See IRC section 7809 (“Treasury of the United   States”).

If the worker opts instead to complete a Withholding Exemption Certificate, consistent with IRC section 3402(n), the payroll officer is not thereby authorized to withhold any federal income taxes.  In this latter situation, there is absolutely no liability for the worker or for the payroll officer;  in other words, there is no liability PERIOD, specifically because there is no withholding agent.

8.               Can a federal regulation create a specific liability, when no specific liability is created by the corresponding statute?

Answer:  No.  The U.S. Constitution vests all legislative power in the Congress of the United States.  See Article I, Section 1.  The Executive Branch of the federal government has no legislative power whatsoever.  This means that agencies of the Executive Branch, and also the federal Courts in the Judicial Branch, are prohibited from making law.

If an Act of Congress fails to create a specific liability for any tax imposed by that Act, then there is no liability for that tax.  Executive agencies have no authority to cure any such omission by using regulations to create a liability.

“[A]n administrative agency may not create a criminal offense or any liability not sanctioned by the lawmaking authority, especially a liability for a tax or inspection fee.”  See Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Acker, 361 U.S. 87, 4 L.Ed.2d 127, 80 S.Ct. 144 (1959), and Independent Petroleum Corp. v. Fly, 141 F.2d 189 (5th Cir. 1944) as cited at 2 Am Jur 2d, p. 129, footnote 2 (1962 edition) [bold emphasis added].  However, this cite from American Jurisprudence has been removed from the 1994 edition of that legal encyclopedia.

9.               The federal regulations create an income tax liability for what specific classes of people?

Answer:  The regulations at 26 CFR 1.1-1 attempted to create a specific liability for all “citizens of the United States” and all “residents of the United   States”.  However, those regulations correspond to IRC section 1, which does not create a specific liability for taxes imposed by subtitle A.

Therefore, these regulations are an overly broad extension of the underlying statutory authority; as such, they are unconstitutional, null and void ab initio (from the beginning, in Latin).  The Acker case cited above held that federal regulations can not exceed the underlying statutory authority.  (See Answer to Question 8 above.)

10.           How many classes of citizens are there, and how did this number come to be?

Answer:  There are two (2) classes of citizens:  State Citizens and federal citizens.  The first class originates in the Qualifications Clauses in the U.S. Constitution, where the term “Citizen of the United   States” is used.  (See 1:2:2, 1:3:3 and 2:1:5.)  Notice the UPPER-CASE “C” in “Citizen”.

The pertinent court cases have defined the term “United States” in these Clauses to mean “States United”, and the full term means “Citizen of ONE OF the States United”.  See People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 337 (1870);  Judge Pablo De La Guerra signed the California Constitution of 1849, when California first joined the Union.  Similar terms are found in the Diversity Clause at Article III, Section 2, Clause 1, and in the Privileges and Immunities Clause at Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1.  Prior to the Civil War, there was only one (1) class of Citizens under American Law.  See the holding in Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914‑915 (1918), for definitive authority on this key point.

The second class originates in the 1866 Civil Rights Act, where the term “citizen of the United States” is used.  This Act was later codified at 42 U.S.C. 1983.  Notice the lower-case “c” in “citizen”.  The pertinent court cases have held that Congress thereby created a municipal franchise primarily for members of the Negro race, who were freed by President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation (a war measure), and later by the Thirteenth Amendment banning slavery and involuntary servitude.  Compelling payment of a “tax” for which there is no liability statute is tantamount to involuntary servitude, and extortion.

13.           What is a “Withholding agent”?

Answer:  (See Answer to Question 7 first.)  The term “Withholding agent” is legally defined at IRC section 7701(a)(16).  It is further defined by the statutes itemized in that section, e.g. IRC 1461 where liability for funds withheld is clearly assigned.  In plain English, a “withholding agent” is a person who is responsible for withholding taxes from a worker’s paycheck, and then paying those taxes into the Treasury of the United States, typically on a quarterly basis.  See IRC section 7809.

One cannot become a withholding agent unless workers first authorize taxes to be withheld from their paychecks.  This authorization is typically done when workers opt to execute a valid W‑4 “Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate.”  In plain English, by signing a W‑4 workers designate themselves as “employees” and certify they are allowing withholding to occur.

If workers do not execute a valid W‑4 form, a company’s payroll officer is not authorized to withhold any federal income taxes from their paychecks.  In other words, the payroll officer does not have “permission” or “power of attorney” to withhold taxes, until and unless workers authorize or “allow” that withholding ‑‑ by signing Form W‑4 knowingly, intentionally and voluntarily.

Pay particular attention to the term “Employee” in the title of this form.  A properly executed Form W‑4 creates the presumption that the workers wish to be treated as if they were “employees” of the federal government.  Obviously, for people who do not work for the federal government, such a presumption is a legal fiction, at best.

15.           What is “tax evasion” and who might be guilty of this crime?

Answer:  “Tax evasion” is the crime of evading a lawful tax.  In the context of federal income taxes, this crime can only be committed by persons who have a legal liability to pay, i.e. the withholding agent.  If one is not employed by the federal government, one is not subject to the Public Salary Tax Act unless one chooses to be treated “as if” one is a federal government “employee.”  This is typically done by executing a valid Form W‑4.

However, as discussed above, Form W‑4 is not mandatory for workers who are not “employed” by the federal government.  Corporations chartered by the 50 States of the Union are technically “foreign” corporations with respect to the IRC;  they are decidedly not the federal government, and should not be regarded “as if” they are the federal government, particularly when they were never created by any Act of Congress.

16.           Why does IRS Form 1040 not require a Notary Public to notarize a taxpayer’s signature?

Answer:  This question is one of the fastest ways to unravel the fraudulent nature of federal income taxes.  At 28 U.S.C. section 1746, Congress authorized written verifications to be executed under penalty of perjury without the need for a Notary Public, i.e. to witness one’s signature.

This statute identifies two different formats for such written verifications:  (1) those executed outside the “United States” and (2) those executed inside the “United States”.  These two formats correspond to sections 1746(1) and 1746(2), respectively.

What is extremely revealing in this statute is the format for verifications executed “outside the United States”.  In this latter format, the statute adds the qualifying phrase “under the laws of the United States of America”.

Clearly, the terms “United States” and “United States of   America” are both used in this same statute.  They are not one and the same.  The former refers to the federal government — in the U.S. Constitution and throughout most federal statutes.  The latter refers to the 50 States that are united by, and under, the U.S. Constitution.  28 U.S.C. 1746 is the only federal statute in all of Title 28 of the United States Code that utilizes the term “United States of America”, as such.

17.           Does the term “United States” have multiple legal meanings and, if so, what are they?

Answer:  Yes.  The term has several meanings.  The term “United States” may be used in any one of several senses.  [1] It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations.  [2] It may designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States extends, or [3] it may be the collective name of the States which are united by and under the Constitution.  See Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945) [bold emphasis, brackets and numbers added for clarity].

18.           Is the term “income” defined in the IRC and, if not, where is it defined?

Answer:  The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has already ruled that the term “income” is not defined anywhere in the IRC:  “The general term ‘income’ is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code.”  U.S. v. Ballard, 535 F.2d 400, 404 (8th Circuit, 1976).

Moreover, in Mark Eisner v. Myrtle H. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), the high Court told Congress it could not legislate any definition of “income” because that term was believed to be in the U.S. Constitution.  The Eisner case was predicated on the ratification of the 16th amendment, which would have introduced the term “income” into the U.S. Constitution for the very first time (but only if that amendment had been properly ratified).

20.           What does it mean if my State is not mentioned in any of the federal income tax statutes?

The general rule is that federal government powers must be expressed and enumerated.  For example, the U.S. Constitution is a grant of enumerated powers.  If a power is not enumerated in the U.S. Constitution, then Congress does not have any authority to exercise that power.  This rule is tersely expressed in the Ninth Amendment, in the Bill of Rights.

If California is not mentioned in any of the federal income tax statutes, then those statutes have no force or effect within that State.  This is also true of all 50 States.

21.           In what other ways is the IRC deliberately vague, and what are the real implications for the average American?

There are numerous other ways in which the IRC is deliberately vague.  The absence of any legal definition for the term “income” is a classic deception.  The IRS enforces the Code as a tax on everything that “comes in,” but nothing could be further from the truth.  “Income” is decidedly NOT everything that “comes in.”

More importantly, the fact that this vagueness is deliberate is sufficient grounds for concluding that the entire Code is null, void and unconstitutional, for violating our fundamental Right to know the nature and cause of any accusation, as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment in the Bill of Rights.

Whether the vagueness is deliberate or not, any statute is unconstitutionally void if it is vague.  If a statute is void for vagueness, the situation is the same as if it had never been enacted at all, and for this reason it can be ignored entirely.

22.           Has Title 26 of the United States Code (“U.S.C.”) ever been enacted into positive law, and what are the legal implications if Title 26 has not been enacted into positive law?

Answer:  No.  Another, less obvious case of deliberate deception is the statute at IRC section 7851(a)(6)(A), where it states that the provisions of subtitle F shall take effect on the day after the date of enactment of “this title”.  Because the term “this title” is not defined anywhere in the IRC, least of all in the section dedicated to definitions, one is forced to look elsewhere for its meaning, or to derive its meaning from context.

Throughout Title 28 of the United States Code — the laws which govern all the federal courts — the term “this title” clearly refers to Title 28.  This fact would tend to support a conclusion that “this title”, as that term is used in the IRC, refers to Title 26 of the United States Code.  However, Title 26 has never been enacted into positive law, as such.

Even though all federal judges may know the secret meaning of “this title”, they are men and women of UNcommon intelligence.  The U.S. Supreme Court’s test for vagueness is violated whenever men and women of common intelligence must necessarily guess at the meaning and differ as to the application of a vague statute.  See Connally et al. v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391 (1926).  Thus, federal judges are applying the wrong test for vagueness.

Accordingly, the provisions of subtitle F have never taken effect.  (“F” is for enForcement!)  This subtitle contains all of the enforcement statutes of the IRC, e.g. filing requirements, penalties for failure to file and tax evasion, grants of court jurisdiction over liens, levies and seizures, summons enforcement and so on.

In other words, the IRC is a big pile of Code without any teeth; as such, it can impose no legal obligations upon anyone, not even people with dentures!

28.           Can the IRS levy bank accounts without a valid court order?

Answer:  No.  The Fifth Amendment prohibits all deprivations of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.  Due Process of Law is another honored and well developed feature of American constitutional practice.  Put simply, it requires Notice and Hearing before any property can be seized by any federal government employees, agents, departments or agencies.

A levy against a bank account is a forced seizure of property, i.e. the funds on deposit in that account.  No such seizure can occur unless due process of law has first run its course.  This means notice, hearing, and deliberate adjudication of all the pertinent issues of law and fact.

Only after this process has run its proper or “due” course, can a valid court order be issued.  The holding in U.S. v. O’Dell, 160 F.2d 304 (6th Cir. 1947), makes it very clear that the IRS can only levy a bank account after first obtaining a Warrant of Distraint, or court ORDER.  And, of course, no court ORDER could ever be obtained unless all affected Parties had first enjoyed their “day in court.”

29.           Do federal income tax revenues pay for any government services and, if so, which government services are funded by federal income taxes?

Answer:  No.  The money trail is very difficult to follow, in this instance, because the IRS is technically a trust with a domicile in Puerto Rico.  See 31 U.S.C. 1321(a)(62).  As such, their records are protected by laws which guarantee the privacy of trust records within that territorial jurisdiction, provided that the trust is not also violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.

 

 

 

The Money Machine

The Money Machine

This isn’t new news; the only part that is new is that an official of the World Bank is coming forward to spill the beans. In the past the world bankers attempted the control of US funds but failed because our elected officials still had compassion and morels toward their contingents. By December 1913 the banksters got a break and created the privately owned Federal Reserve. Of course they swore up and down this would stabilize our economy, right. The act just gave them the ability to create booms and busts to their advantage. This corruption and lawlessness doesn’t stop with the world bankers, they have bought 90% of the world governments including most of ours.

I hope Ms. Hudes has a Kevlar vest and armed body guards because anybody that has tried to bring the world bankers into the open normally has one foot in the grave. I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if we don’t hear she committed suicide by shooting herself in the back of the head twice and then hanging herself.

I would have linked to this article but, I read so much I can’t remember where it came from. If I find it I’ll post it.

World Bank Insider Blows Whistle on Corruption, Federal Reserve

A former insider at the World Bank, ex-Senior Counsel Karen Hudes, says the global financial system is dominated by a small group of corrupt, power-hungry figures centered around the privately owned U.S. Federal Reserve. The network has seized control of the media to cover up its crimes, too, she explained. In an interview with The New American, Hudes said that when she tried to blow the whistle on multiple problems at the World Bank, she was fired for her efforts. Now, along with a network of fellow whistleblowers, Hudes is determined to expose and end the corruption. And she is confident of success.

Citing an explosive 2011 Swiss study published in the PLOS ONE journal on the “network of global corporate control,” Hudes pointed out that a small group of entities — mostly financial institutions and especially central banks — exert a massive amount of influence over the international economy from behind the scenes. “What is really going on is that the world’s resources are being dominated by this group,” she explained, adding that the “corrupt power grabbers” have managed to dominate the media as well. “They’re being allowed to do it.”

According to the peer-reviewed paper, which presented the first global investigation of ownership architecture in the international economy, transnational corporations form a “giant bow-tie structure.” A large portion of control, meanwhile, “flows to a small tightly-knit core of financial institutions.” The researchers described the core as an “economic ‘super-entity’” that raises important issues for policymakers and researchers. Of course, the implications are enormous for citizens as well.

Hudes, an attorney who spent some two decades working in the World Bank’s legal department, has observed the machinations of the network up close. “I realized we were now dealing with something known as state capture, which is where the institutions of government are co-opted by the group that’s corrupt,” she told The New American in a phone interview. “The pillars of the U.S. government — some of them — are dysfunctional because of state capture; this is a big story, this is a big cover up.”

At the heart of the network, Hudes said, are 147 financial institutions and central banks — especially the Federal Reserve, which was created by Congress but is owned by essentially a cartel of private banks. “This is a story about how the international financial system was secretly gamed, mostly by central banks — they’re the ones we are talking about,” she explained. “The central bankers have been gaming the system. I would say that this is a power grab.”

The Fed in particular is at the very center of the network and the coverup, Hudes continued, citing a policy and oversight body that includes top government and Fed officials. Central bankers have also been manipulating gold prices, she added, echoing widespread concerns that The New American has documented extensively. Indeed, even the inaccurate World Bank financial statements that Hudes has been trying to expose are linked to the U.S. central bank, she said.

“The group that we’re talking about from the Zurich study — that’s the Federal Reserve; it has some other pieces to it, but that’s the Federal Reserve,” Hudes explained. “So the Federal Reserve secretly dominated the world economy using secret, interlocking corporate directorates, and terrorizing anybody who managed to figure out that they were having any kind of role, and putting people in very important positions so that they could get a free pass.”

The shadowy but immensely powerful Bank for International Settlements serves as “the club of these private central bankers,” Hudes continued. “Now, are people going to want interest on their country’s debts to continue to be paid to that group when they find out the secret tricks that that group has been doing? Don’t forget how they’ve enriched themselves extraordinarily and how they’ve taken taxpayer money for the bailout.”

As far as intervening in the gold price, Hudes said it was an effort by the powerful network and its central banks to “hold onto its paper currency” — a suspicion shared by many analysts and even senior government officials. The World Bank whistleblower also said that contrary to official claims, she did not believe there was any gold being held in Fort Knox. Even congressmen and foreign governments have tried to find out if the precious metals were still there, but they met with little success. Hudes, however, believes the scam will eventually come undone.

“This is like crooks trying to figure out where they can go hide. It’s a mafia,” she said. “These culprits that have grabbed all this economic power have succeeded in infiltrating both sides of the issue, so you will find people who are supposedly trying to fight corruption who are just there to spread disinformation and as a placeholder to trip up anybody who manages to get their act together.… Those thugs think that if they can keep the world ignorant, they can bleed it longer.”

Of course, the major corruption at the highest levels of government and business is not a new phenomenon. Georgetown University historian and Professor Carroll Quigley, who served as President Bill Clinton’s mentor, for example, wrote about the scheme in his 1966 book Tragedy And Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time. The heavyweight academic, who was allowed to review documents belonging to the top echelons of the global establishment, even explained how the corrupt system would work — remarkably similar to what Hudes describes.

“The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole,” wrote Prof. Quigley, who agreed with the goals but not the secrecy. “This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.”

But it is not going to happen, Hudes said — at least not if she has something do to with it. While the media are dominated by the “power grabber” network, Hudes has been working with foreign governments, reporters, U.S. officials, state governments, and a broad coalition of fellow whistleblowers to blow the entire scam wide open. There has been quite a bit of interest, too, particularly among foreign governments and state officials in the United States.

Citing the wisdom of America’s Founding Fathers in creating a federal system of government with multiple layers of checks and balances, Hudes said she was confident that the network would eventually be exposed and subjected to the rule of law, stopping the secret corruption. If and when that happens — even if it may be disorderly — Hudes says precious metals will once again play a role in imposing discipline on the monetary system. The rule of law would also be restored, she said, and the public will demand a proper press to stay informed.

“We’re going to have a cleaned-up financial system, that’s where it is going, but in the meantime, people who didn’t know how the system was gamed are going to find out,” she said. “We’re going to have a different kind of international financial system…. It’ll be a new kind of world where people know what’s going on — no more backroom deals; that’s not going to keep happening. We’re going to have a different kind of media if people don’t want to be dominated and controlled, which I don’t think they do.”

While Hudes sounded upbeat, she recognizes that the world is facing serious danger right now — there are even plans in place to impose martial law in the United States, she said. The next steps will be critical for humanity. As such, Hudes argues, it is crucial that the people of the world find out about the lawlessness, corruption, and thievery that are going on at the highest levels — and put a stop to it once and for all. The consequences of inaction would be disastrous.

Mr. Roberts, if you don’t already know was assistant treasury secretary in the Reagan regime. So this is not one of your run of the mill puppet spokes people. I would wager he has a pretty good handle on the current affairs of todays concerning subjects. Listen close.

 

 

 

 

 

There’s more to this than molesting children. Theres the vatican bank scandal, or maybe the release of the gospel of Barnabas which is in a vault in Turkey.

He meet with the Knights of Malta recently while missing a cardinal funeral. Did kom fire him?

Or is it the last Pope prophecy “Petrus Romanus” (anti-christ) and the 3rd Secret of Fatima.

A lot of ?????’s and appears this outfit is demanding justice. Search the above bold words.

 

 

Diplomatic Note was issued to Vatican just prior to his resignation

New Pope and Catholic clergy face indictment and arrest as “Easter Reclamation” plan continues

A Global Media Release and Statement from The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State 

Brussels:

The historically unprecedented resignation of Joseph Ratzinger as Pope this week was compelled by an upcoming action by a European government to issue an arrest warrant against Ratzinger and a public lien against Vatican property and assets by Easter.

The ITCCS Central Office in Brussels is compelled by Pope Benedict’s sudden abdication to disclose the following details:

1. On Friday, February 1, 2013, on the basis of evidence supplied by our affiliated Common Law Court of Justice (itccs.org), our Office concluded an agreement with representatives of a European nation and its courts to secure an arrest warrant against Joseph Ratzinger, aka Pope Benedict, for crimes against humanity and ordering a criminal conspiracy.

2. This arrest warrant was to be delivered to the office of the “Holy See” in Rome on Friday, February 15, 2013. It allowed the nation in question to detain Ratzinger as a suspect in a crime if he entered its sovereign territory.

3. A diplomatic note was issued by the said nation’s government to the Vatican’s Secretary of State, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, on Monday, February 4, 2013, informing Bertone of the impending arrest warrant and inviting his office to comply. No reply to this note was received from Cardinal Bertone or his office; but six days later, Pope Benedict resigned.

4. The agreement between our Tribunal and the said nation included a second provision to issue a commercial lien through that nation’s courts against the property and wealth of the Roman Catholic church commencing on Easter Sunday, March 31, 2013. This lien was to be accompanied by a public and global “Easter Reclamation Campaign” whereby Catholic church property was to be occupied and claimed by citizens as public assets forfeited under international law and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

5. It is the decision of our Tribunal and the said nation’s government to proceed with the arrest of Joseph Ratzinger upon his vacating the office of the Roman Pontiff on a charge of crimes against humanity and criminal conspiracy.

6. It is our further decision to proceed as well with the indictment and arrest of Joseph Ratzinger’s successor as Pope on the same charges; and to enforce the commercial lien and “Easter Reclamation Campaign” against the Roman Catholic church, as planned.

In closing, our Tribunal acknowledges that Pope Benedict’s complicity in criminal activities of the Vatican Bank (IOR) was compelling his eventual dismissal by the highest officials of the Vatican. But according to our sources, Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone forced Joseph Ratzinger’s resignation immediately, and in direct response to the diplomatic note concerning the arrest warrant that was issued to him by the said nation’s government on February 4, 2013.

We call upon all citizens and governments to assist our efforts to legally and directly disestablish the Vatican, Inc. and arrest its chief officers and clergy who are complicit in crimes against humanity and the ongoing criminal conspiracy to aid and protect child torture and trafficking.

Further bulletins on the events of the Easter Reclamation Campaign will be issued by our Office this week.

Issued 13 February, 2013
12:00 am GMT
by the Brussels Central Office

Fool me Once

Alex Jones Propaganda

Here’s a perfect example of “rise up” when your not prepared Alex Jones propaganda video. Just like the corporate government, he wants you to do something that can get you killed or hauled off to be re-educated. Times where much different during the early years of this country, arms where evenly distributed among the population and the military. Everyone had the same tech. A blacksmith could produce a cannon and other arms of the time. Today it is a whole different story, try and manufacture a black-market strike drone, microwave/sound cannon or satellite camera. To produce today’s weapons would not be an easy task.  Be prepared, organized and ready for anything and don’t fall for a trap. TPTB want you to react without thinking or preparation, start thinking and training now and don’t let em fool ya.  Talk to close friends and family and make a plan for your well-being.

Vid sounds good but, think with that other half of your brain. The other half will tell you why would this be allowed in a controlled state? The media  powers in dc could shut down info junk wars in a heart beat, they would if he wasn’t doing their dirty work. Which is spreading mis-information and half truths.

Banksters at work

In case you missed this, on MSM even.

I can’t stress this enough. Don’t keep any more in a bank then necessary and if anyway possible, don’t use the corrupt banking system at all.  Some states are so broke they will steal your wealth.

 

The Sheeple Quiz

 

 

 The Sheeple Quiz

#1) The purpose of the mainstream media is to:

A) Keep you informed.
B) Feed you misinformation/disinformation while keeping you distracted from the real issues our country and the world is facing.

#2) Social Security is:

A) A financial safety net that makes sure people have a retirement income.
B) A government-run Ponzi scheme that requires more and more people to keep paying in just to stay afloat and will ultimately collapse into total bankruptcy.

#3) The fluoride dripped into municipal water supplies is:

A) A naturally-occurring mineral.
B) An industrial chemical waste byproduct which makes you more susceptible to suggestion.

#4) When you donate money to find the cure for cancer, that money goes:

A) To fund research programs that assess actual cancer cures for the purpose of freely sharing them with the public.
B) To fund mammogram campaigns that actually irradiate women’s breasts, causing the very cancers that earn huge profits for the cancer treatment industry.

#5) The national debt is:

A) Under control and will be paid off in a few years.
B) Out of control and will spiral into a runaway debt collapse forcing the USD to become worthless.

#6) GMOs will:

A) Feed the world and prevent starvation.
B) Threaten the future of life on our planet through genetic contamination and widespread crop failures.

#7) The FDA protects:

A) The people from dangerous medicines.
B) The financial interests of the drug companies.

#8) The EPA’s real agenda is to:

A) Protect the environment.
B) Protect the financial interests of the chemical companies whose toxic products destroy the environment.

#9) The Federal Reserve functions to:

A) Stabilize the economy and keep America strong.
B) Loot the economy and control America’s economy for the interests of the few making billions for private banks and corporations.

#10) The purpose of TSA checkpoints at airports is to:

A) Keep air passengers safe and secure.
B) Indoctrinate Americans into surrendering to police state invasions of their privacy while radiating passengers with back scatter radiation.

#11) The practical function of the U.S. Supreme Court is to:

A) Protect the constitutional rights of the citizens.
B) Legitimize federal tyranny over the People by ignoring the Constitution and its Bill of Rights.

#12) Vaccines are based on:

A) Gold standard science that conclusively proves their safety and effectiveness.
B) Quackery and fraud combined with a persistent medical mythology that utterly lacks a factual basis while making billions for pharmaceutical companies.

#13) Herbs and super-foods:

A) Are medically useless and cannot treat, prevent or cure any disease.
B) Contain powerful plant-based medicines that can help reverse and prevent disease.

#14) In Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq, (Syria)America:

A) Led a humanitarian effort to save innocent people from tyranny.
B) Waged an illegal imperialist war to occupy foreign nations and control their oil and natural resources.

#15) The U.S. Bill of Rights

A) Grants you rights and freedoms.
B) Merely acknowledges the rights and freedoms you already possess

I don’t remember where I got this but, think it’s appropriate for the times. All this has not happened overnight. They have been working on this from the time of the fraudulent war between the states. These people think long term plans and bloodlines. They know the power plan will be carried out by thier children because the wealth and power is so tempting. The Horror!
 
 
Transferring the People’s Wealth to the Elite
 
[Author of this excerpt is unknown]
 
First, arrange to take trillions of dollars away from those who create the nation’s wealth, and to do so year after year. Only a government can do this, so that’s the tool you have to work with. In our example for this lesson – the United States – the federal government was used to create the two major elements of the plan; both were put in place, ready to drain the wealth from an unsuspecting public, in 1913.
 
The first item was a nationwide income tax. The U.S. Constitution forbade such a thing, so a constitutional amendment was called for. The Sixteenth Amendment was ratified February 3, 1913. You’ll want an income tax at a minimum, so plan accordingly.
 
Next, add a central bank and fiat currency, because to take ALL the wealth from a productive society, you need more than just an income tax and a raft of other taxes: You need to counterfeit that society’s money on a massive scale, printing up trillions of (in our case) dollars to fund those Important Plans that citizens would otherwise be too cheap and too selfish to pay for. Eventually the nation’s currency will become worthless (ditto the incomes and savings of the people), but that’s a small price to pay for transferring the nation’s wealth to the Elite, who clearly deserve and know best how to use this wealth. In our example, the U.S. constitution (still!) requires each state to use only gold or silver as legal tender – can’t very well counterfeit that! – but an end-run around this requirement needed only to have the Federal Reserve begin operation while gold and silver were still circulating as legal money in the United States. When monetary inflation finally made the situation untenable, our man Franklin “Internment Camp” Roosevelt made possession of more than $100 in gold coin illegal, confiscated the rest, and devalued the dollar from $20 per ounce of gold to $35/oz, overnight. The rubes never knew what hit them! Later, the silver was removed from lesser coinage. Somehow, the American people forgot to protest all this.
 
Next, spend the stolen loot primarily on war and on hunting down, prosecuting, and imprisoning peaceful people for drug use (or sale) and for other non-crimes that have been criminalized by Congress or by the stroke of a regulator’s pen. This brings both a standing army (and the trillions of dollars it spends equipping and running itself; an excellent way for the Elite to pad their coffers) and an expanding, ever-tightening web of regulations, laws, secret policemen, prisons, and related actions and institutions ripe for corruption – still more opportunity for those with capital and political connections.
 
Don’t forget to spend trillions of the people’s dollars on a coercive Ponzi-scheme retirement plan that is itself then looted by Congress to pad the General Fund (until the incoming Social Security taxes fall below the outgo, as happened recently; then the Ponzi scheme becomes a drain on the General Fund – not a good omen for Baby Boomers and those who follow). You’ll need clever schemes like this if you want to get every last scrap of wealth out of a country.
 
Spend more trillions of the people’s money on “poverty programs” that have by now, in our example, kept several generations poverty-stricken and dependent upon hand-outs from the State, while as a side-effect reducing the level of honest charity due to heavier tax-loads and to the perception that “government is taking care of the problem.” Of the several benefits this provides to the Elite, the most important may be that – as Roman emperors knew so well – providing bread and circuses to the masses means you can count on the support of those receiving the bread and enjoying the circuses. The popular libertarian (i.e., terrorist) adage on the subject is “He who steals from Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the support of Paul.”
 
But don’t stop there! Get the government involved in controlling everything from major industries to personal behavior (of course, “controlling” would be bad PR, so be sure to call it “regulating“). How does this work for the all-important Elite? Just ask those of us in Big Pharma, Big Agriculture, Big Medicine, Big Oil, Big Banking, or any other regulated industry where prices keep going up, quality and safety keep going down, and no matter how horrifying or illegal the behavior of those involved, the money keeps pouring in – while the rubes keep getting poorer. Bonus: You get to watch the rubes clamoring for “more regulation” to solve the problem! (Try not to laugh at this – at least not in public).
 
What about after you’ve looted the entire nation and taken all its actual wealth? Even at this point, there are still trillions of dollars to be taken from the rubes; don’t leave this money on the table! Simply have the bankrupt government borrow trillions of dollars year after year (YOU won’t be paying it back, of course!) to keep the main scams going, and get the central bank to print up so many trillions of new dollars (much of this can be handed directly to bankers and other members of the Elite) that people lose count, go numb, and turn back to their televisions rather than think about what’s actually happening. A perfect example: The Federal Reserve recently created and loaned about $16 trillion in near-zero-interest, “probably won’t ever get repaid” money to its pals at big banks and corporations worldwide – more than the annual GDP for the entire United States! The citizen-rubes of the U.S. didn’t HAVE that money (to loan or to do anything else with), and they sure won’t be benefitting from the loans, but guess whose retirement funds and savings accounts and paychecks are worth less and less every day because the Elite keep printing up those trillions of shiny new dollars (OK, mostly electronic account dollar-entries)?
 
– 2 –
But . . . Won’t the People be Angry?
 
Of course they will! Who wants to lose their nice suburban split-level home and have to spend the rest of their lives in a tent city or living out of their car? Who wants to trade a high-paying career (with benefits!) for panhandling on a corner near the local Wal-Mart?
 
No one, that’s who. So when you’re planning to siphon off ALL the wealth from a nation, you’d better also plan to protect yourself from prosecution and from retribution from your victims. Fortunately, with a little planning and finesse, you can get your victims to pay for THIS along with everything else.
 
How? One word: “Terrorism.”
 
Before we get to that, note that you’ll already have the courts on your side, and of course you’ll literally OWN the major media so THEY’LL be working for you. And you naturally would have long ago arranged to control the major universities as well as the “public” schools, so the rubes (and even their parents) will have been getting a steady dose of pro-Elite propaganda from childhood on. But all the propaganda in the world won’t completely insulate you from the angry Mob (and don’t kid yourself: At bottom, that’s what those “citizens” are) when the Big Wealth Transfer is nearly complete and it’s time to move on to the next stage.
 
You could simply hire more private security, but then YOU would be the one paying for it and besides: Private security might not be enough. Given what you’ve done to an entire nation by this point, in fact, private security would almost certainly be inadequate.
 
The answer lies in that Standing Army created earlier and in those bloated internal police forces, domestic spy agencies, and other arms of government surveillance and control. Insist that terrorists are everywhere (with a little help from the FBI, your media should be able to sell this to the entire country), trying to kill the helpless citizens that you (or your proxy the government) claim to be protecting and In Charge Of.
 
Presto! You’ve got both justification and, with a little work by Congress, a legal framework for whatever you want to do to the Mob in order to protect yourself from them. Strip-search little old ladies at the airport? Sure! Have the NSA and hundreds of other federal agencies, and organizations, not to mention almost 2,000 private companies, spy on every phone call and email? Go ahead: Who’s going to stop you? And don’t forget to build and staff dozens of internment camps to put troublemakers into when the crap really hits the fan. Not that the government has the resources to house, feed, and care for millions of detained Americans in such camps for long, but . . . you’ll think of SOMETHING to do about the problem. After which, you won’t need so many “security” goons. And for that, again, you’ll think of something.
 
That’s it: You’re done! When you’ve reached this point, you are finished with the Big Wealth Transfer part of the program. To continue this lesson plan, please purchase our Moving Control to the Global Level package.

I’v been able to vote for over 35 years and have never voted in an election. I never wanted to be part of or take part in a corrupt system. I never will vote. If the i-r-s goes after you they use your voter registration to prove your a federal US citizen.

 

Message to the Voting Cattle – Larken Rose