Tag Archive: Media


bm8 chair

It’s hard to understand after all the evidence that the Boston Bombing was a False Flag event, the same with  9-11 people still just don’t get it. Even if they do when will they stand up and say no more. No more killing and war for other countries and states, no more taking away our liberties and rights, no more mass media control, no more political greed, no more private federal reserve money machine, no more presidential executive orders, no more military in the streets, no more fe-ma camps, no more chem-trails, no more GMO food, no more . IT’S TIME TO WAKEUP AND TAKE BACK THIS ONCE GREAT LAND OF OPPORTUNITY>

Iv just about had it with the whole thing. People of this union have been so dumbed down by public schools, media and political lies they can’t think for themselves, nor do they belive whats right in front of their eyes. The horror.

Check out VT at below link

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05/04/man-of-the-year-stella-trimblay-nh-legislator/

 

Unlike 911 the authorities are taking more time in pinning the blame of this horrible event by pointing the finger at some group or individual(s). With 911 they knew who was to blame almost as it was happening, without evidence. Who will be the ultimate felon of the BM race event? Will it be middle east or middle america that will be the accused? If this was a foreign terror group I would think the bomb would have been much more devastating. Who ever they pin this bombing on we will undoubtedly have more rights and liberties trashed. I’m sure every state in the union will bring more laws to the floor thinking they can make this all better. And don’t forget the fear factor, is this a “problem – reaction – solution” event? Where some shady group creates the problem then waits for the reaction from the public and then they come up with a solution that increases their power and maintains the status quo.

 

                                  I really like the wit and satire in this short artical.

 

_____________________________________________________

By: Tom Chatham

Commentators are always quick to link guns and emergency stores to dangerous  and paranoid actions that they consider to be tell tale signs someone is going to commit a crime. They always focus on these areas because it is a trait mostly seen in conservatives that know enough to question the governments’ ability to take care of every problem that emerges. In short, if you are not a Liberal that needs the government to make all of your decisions for you and care for you on a daily basis then there must be something wrong with you.

Any deviation from the norm of unpreparedness is a danger sign to these people that you are out of control and need to be stopped, detained and heavily medicated to assure compliance. Only when you are obedient to the state are you normal and safe. So what signs do you look for in a person or group that should make you suspicious?

The purchase of bullets by the thousands

If a person or group feels the need to purchase thousands of rounds of ammo in the belief they may need this to protect themselves and their family from some type of uncontrolled chaos in the future they are obviously troubled individuals. They need to be more sensible like the U.S. government that only buys 1.5 billion rounds of ammo, give or take a few million, that is only the bare minimum necessary for waging a 24 year war.

The purchasing of weapons by the dozen

If a person or group feels the need to have one firearm to protect themselves or their family due to lack of police protection, this is just irrational. And to have a dozen guns is bordering on paranoia. They need to be more like the U.S. government that only has 165.000 armed federal employees, give or take several thousand, and have several thousand automatic rifles on order as well as two million dollars worth of sniper rifles on order from Remington.

The storing of dehydrated and freeze dried foods for several months

If you perceive the potential need for stored food because of distribution problems or social chaos, having food stores for several months is just promoting the panic. You need to be more like the federal government and buy a billion dollars worth of freeze dried foods for “disaster relief operations”.

The building of underground bunkers for several people

The need for hiding underground in a bunker with several people is a clear sign that you are disturbed and very anti social and may be unbalanced. You need to have “shelters” like the U.S. government does that house at least a thousand people, and number no less then 150 nationwide to be considered normal.

Conclusion:

Never order ammo in amounts less than one billion rounds

Never buy weapons in quantities of less than one thousand

Never buy less than one billion dollars worth of freeze dried food

Never build underground shelters that hold less than one thousand persons

Anyone who prepares with less than these amounts should be considered a dangerous and paranoid doomsday prepper by government standards. Any amounts over this are government sanctioned and considered appropriate measures for normal persons to take.  http://projectchesapeake.wordpress.com/

Hugo Chavez — Paul Craig Roberts

Orignal post at: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/

On March 5, 2013, Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela and world leader against imperialism, died.  Washington imperialists and their media and think tank whores expressed gleeful sighs of relief as did the brainwashed US population. An “enemy of America” was gone.

Chavez was not an enemy of America. He was an enemy of Washington’s hegemony over other countries, an enemy of Washington’s alliance with elite ruling cliques who steal from the people they grind down and deny sustenance. He was an enemy of Washington’s injustice, of Washington’s foreign policy based on lies and military aggression, bombs and invasions.

Washington is not America. Washington is Satan’s home town.

Chavez was a friend of truth and justice, and this made him unpopular throughout the Western World where every political leader regards truth and justice as dire threats.

Chavez was a world leader. Unlike US politicians, Chavez was respected throughout the non-western world. He was awarded honorary doctorates from China, Russia, Brazil, and other countries, but not from Harvard, Yale, Cambridge, and Oxford.

Chavez was a miracle. He was a miracle, because he did not sell out to the United States and the Venezuelan elites. Had he sold out, Chavez would have become very rich from oil revenues, like the Saudi Royal Family, and he would have been honored by the United States in the way that Washington honors all its puppets: with visits to the White House. He could have become a dictator for life as long as he served Washington.

Each of Washington’s puppets, from Asia to Europe and the Middle East, anxiously awaits the invitation that demonstrates Washington’s appreciation of his or her servitude to the global imperialist power that still occupies Japan and Germany 68 years after World War II and South Korea 60 years after the end of the Korean War and has placed  troops and military bases in a large number of other “sovereign” countries.

It would have been politically easy for Chavez to sell out. All he had to do was to continue populist rhetoric, promote his allies in the army, throw more benefits to the underclass than its members had ever previously experienced, and divide the rest of the oil revenues with the corrupt Venezuelan elites.

But Chavez was a real person, like Rafael Correa, the three-term elected president of Ecuador, who stood up to the United States and granted political asylum to the persecuted Julian Assange, and Evo Morales, the first indigenous president of Bolivia since the Spanish conquest. The majority of Venezuelans understood that Chavez was a real person. They elected him to four terms as president and would have continued electing him as long as he lived. What Washington hates most is a real person who cannot be bought.

The more the corrupt western politicians and media whores demonized Chavez, the more Venezuelans loved him. They understood completely that anyone damned by Washington was God’s gift to the world.

It is costly to stand up to Washington. All who are bold enough to do so are demonized. They risk assassination and being overthrown in a CIA-organized coup, as Chavez was in 2002. When CIA-instructed Venezuelan elites sprung their coup and kidnapped Chavez, the coup was overthrown by the Venezuelan people who took to the streets and by elements of the military before Chavez could be murdered by the CIA-controlled Venezuelan elites, who escaped with their own venal lives only because, unlike them, Chavez was humanitarian. The Venezuelan people rose in instantaneous and massive public defense of Chavez and put the lie to the Bush White House claim that Chavez was a dictator.

Showing its sordid corruption, the New York Times took the side of the undemocratic coup by a handful of elitists against the democratically elected Chavez, and declared that Chavez’s removal by a small group of rich elites and CIA operatives meant that “Venezuelan democracy is no longer threatened by a would-be dictator.”

The lies and demonization continue with Chavez’s death. He will never be forgiven for standing up for justice.  Neither will Correa and Morales, both of whom are no doubt on assassination lists.

CounterPunch, Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting, and other commentators have collected examples of the venom-spewing obituaries that the western presstitutes have written for Chavez, essentially celebrations that death has silenced the bravest voice on earth.  http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/08/obituaries-for-hugo-chavez/ http://fair.org/take-action/media-advisories/in-death-as-in-life-chavez-target-of-media-scorn/

Perhaps the most absurd of all was Associated Press business reporter Pamela Sampson’s judgment that Chavez wasted Venezuela’s oil wealth on “social programs including state-run food markets, cash benefits for poor families, free health clinics and education programs,” a poor use of money that could have been used to build sky scrappers such as “the world’s tallest building in Dubai and branches of the Louvre and Guggenheim museums in Abu Dhabi.” http://www.fair.org/blog/2013/03/06/ap-chavez-wasted-his-money-on-healthcare-when-he-could-have-built-gigantic-skyscrapers/

Among the tens of millions of Washington’s victims in the world–the people of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Syria, Palestine, Lebanon, Mali, with Iran, Russia, China, and South America waiting in the wings for sanctions, destabilization, conquest or reconquest, Chavez’s September 20, 2006 speech at the UN General Assembly during the George W. Bush regime will stand forever as the greatest speech of the early 21st century.

Chavez beards the lion, or rather Satan, in his own den:

“Yesterday, the devil himself stood right here, at this podium, speaking as if he owned the world.  You can still smell the sulfur.”

“We should call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday’s statement made by the president of the United States. As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world. An Alfred Hitchcock movie could use it as a scenario. I would even propose a title: ‘the Devil’s Recipe.’”

The UN General Assembly had never heard such words, not even in the days when the militarily powerful Soviet Union was present. Faces broke out in smiles of approval, but no one dared to clap.  Too much US money for the home country was at stake. [A reader pointed out that although Chavez’s speech was not interrupted with clapping, he received a healthy round of applause at the end.]

The US and UK delegations fled the scene, like vampires confronted with garlic and the Cross or werewolves confronted with silver bullets.

Chavez spoke about the false democracy of elites that is imposed by force and on others by “weapons and bombs.”  Chavez asked, “What type of democracy do you impose with Marines and bombs?”

Wherever George W. Bush looks, Chavez said, “he sees extremists. And you, my brother–he looks at your color, and he says, oh, there’s an extremist. Evo Morales, the worthy president of Bolivia, looks like an extremist to him. The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It is not that we are extremists. It is that the world is waking up. It is waking up all over and people are standing up.”

In two short sentences totaling 20 words, Chavez defined for all times early 21st century Washington:  “The imperium is afraid of truth, is afraid of independent voices. It calls us extremists, but they are the extremists.”

Throughout South America and the non-western world, Chavez’s death is being blamed on Washington. South Americans are aware of the US congressional hearings in the 1970s when the Church Committee brought to light the various CIA schemes to poison Fidel Castro.

The official document presented to President John F. Kennedy by the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, known as the Northwoods Project, is known to the world and is available online. The Northwoods project consisted of a false flag attack on American citizens in order to blame Cuba and create public and world acceptance for US-imposed regime change in Cuba. President Kennedy rejected the proposal as inconsistent with morality and accountable government. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

The belief has already hardened in South America that Washington with its hideous technologies of death infected Chavez with cancer in order to remove him as an obstacle to Washington’s hegemony over South America.

This belief will never die: Chavez, the greatest South American since Simon Bolivar, was murdered by Washington. True or false, the belief is set in stone.  As Washington and globalism destroy more countries, the lives of elites become more precarious.

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt understood that security for the rich required economic security for the underclasses. Roosevelt established in the US a weak form of social democracy that European politicians had already understood was necessary for social cohesion and political and economic stability.

The Clinton, Bush, and Obama regimes set about undermining the stability that Roosevelt provided, as Thatcher, Major, Blair, and the current prime minister of the UK undermined the social agreement between classes in the UK. Politicians in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand also made the mistake of handing power over to private elites at the expense of social and economic stability.

Gerald Celente predicts that the elites will not survive the hatred and anger that they are bringing upon themselves.  I suspect that he is correct. The American middle class is being destroyed. The working class has become a proletariat, and the social welfare system is being destroyed in order to reduce the budget deficit caused by the loss of tax revenues to jobs offshoring and the expense of wars, overseas military bases, and financial bailouts. The American people are being compelled to suffer in order that elites can continue with their agendas.

The US elites know what is coming. That is why they created a Nazi-style Ministry of the Interior known as Homeland Security, armed with enough ammunition to kill every American five times and with tanks to neutralize the Second Amendment rights of Americans.  http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34259.htm http://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphbenko/2013/03/11/1-6-billion-rounds-of-ammo-for-homeland-security-its-time-for-a-national-conversation/

Pistols and rifles are useless against tanks, as the Branch Davidians found out in Waco, Texas. The protection of a small handful of elites from the Americans they are oppressing is also the reason the police are being militarized, brought under Washington’s control and armed with drones that can assassinate the real leaders of the American people who will be, not in the legislative, executive, or judicial chambers, but in the streets.  http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-militarization-of-law-enforcement-in-america-use-of-military-technology-and-tactics-by-local-level-police/5326303

Internment camps in the US appear to be real and not a conspiracy theory. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfkZ1yri26s http://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-InternmentResettlement.pdf

The threat that the US government poses to its own citizens was recognized on March 7, 2013, by two US Senators, Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Rand Paul (R-KY), who introduced a bill to prevent the US government from murdering its own citizens: “The Federal Government may not use a drone to kill a citizen of the United States who is located in the United States” unless the person “poses an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury to another individual. Nothing in this section shall be construed to suggest that the Constitution would otherwise allow the killing of a citizen of the United States in the United States without due process of law.”  http://www.cruz.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=339952

The “indispensable people” with their presidents Bush and Obama have begun the 21st century with death and violence.  That is their only legacy.

The death and violence that Washington has unleashed will come back to Washington and to the corrupt political elites everywhere. As Gerald Celente says, the first great war of the 21st century has begun.

The Illusion Of Choice

The complete genius of George Carlin, who could say it better? I’m surprised he was alive as long as he was. The PTB I’m certain wanted him gone long before he was. So many live in the illusion of mass media control. Don’t be an delusional programmed mass educational puppet.

 

There’s more going on with this than meets the eyes. With the economy in the brink and unlimited QE3 about to happen, it seems theres something nasty on the wind. 

 

Such a FUSS over a silly anti-Islam movie!

As I type these words, riots have erupted all across the middle east. Protesters attacked the US Consulate in Benghazi and killed the US Ambassador. In Cairo, protesters have surrounded the US Embassy and chant for the Americans to get out. In Iraq, Yemen, and a dozen other nations, the same is happening.

The consistent theme in all these protests is that America must leave.

The US corporate media tells a different tale. According to ABCNNBBCBSFOX, all this anger is over a silly little movie bashing Mohammed. The film, produced by An Israeli with Jewish donors a Coptic Christian (to get Israel off of the hook) a CIA/Mossad asset  who the heck knows, was intentionally created to be as offensive as possible to Muslims. The fact that it was a contrived piece of propaganda from the start is obvious. The entire cast and crew has gone public saying they were duped into making the film, with its offensive content added in during post production. In Hollywood, the normal behavior is to have ones name on everything one works on. That this film’s producer worked so hard to keep himself hidden betrays the propaganda agenda.

But the American corporate media is trying to sell a message that all Muslims hate Americans without a good reason; that the riots are solely over this film, and since those eeeeeeviilllllll mooooooslims don’t respect the First Amendment right to free speech, real patriotic Americans should believe that the Muslims have over-reacted.

But the rage seen across the mideast has very little to do with the film. They don’t hate us for our freedoms, or for our religion. Those people in the nations invaded and subverted by the United States through a decade of overt and covert wars on behalf of Israel hate America because every time they see their friends and neighbors blown to bloody bits before their eyes, the shrapnel is stamped, “Made in the USA.”

Do the citizens of those invaded nations have reason to hate America, other than that silly little film?

Well, yes, they do.

So, you think all that anger and rage is just because of a provocative movie?

If what you see above was being done to your family and friends, how would you feel?

That is how they feel. Their countries have been invaded on the basis of lies, their government subverted to serve foreign interests, their women and children killed, their places of worship bombed, their cultural history buried under rubble.

So why the big lie on American TV that this is all about a movie? To obscure the reality of what these invaded people have suffered at the hands of America by trivialities their rage. To demonize the Muslims by making their anger seem entirely out of proportion and unreasonable.

To ignite a wider war.

In the months before 9-11, there was a sudden surge of embassy attacks, all blamed on Osama Bin Laden. Those embassy attacks were the “warm up”, a pre-sell of the idea that America was under threat from “Radical Islam” to prepare them mentally to believe the official story when 9-11 itself finally happened. And I greatly fear we may be seeing a repeat of this tactic.

For months, Netanyahu has been pushing for the United States to commit to as war with Iran, before Israel’s elections in October. President Obama, knowing that Americans are weary of wars on Israel’s enemies, wants to wait until after the November elections in the US. That Netanyahu cannot do, as absent a war to wave at the Israeli voters, the Likud party may well lose to the Kadima party, which means a pink slip for Netanyahu.

Netanyahu is in a corner, and desperate. His only remaining option is a new false-flag attack to be blamed on Iran, something spectacular enough to “motivate” the American people to throw their children onto the Iranian bayonets, something that will trick Americans into supporting Obama when he joins Israel’s attack on Iran. Lastly, a spectacular false-flag attack, blamed on Iran, would undermine the Russian and Chinese commitments to defend Iran if Israel and the US attacks. If it is all “Iran’s fault” in the eyes of their citizens, Russia and China may have to back down.

False-flag attacks are nothing new. The Lavon Affair was a classic example. So was the attack on the USS Liberty. So was 9-11.

So what is Netanyahu considering? Obviously if it involves a nuclear weapon, Netanyahu can say that it proves he was right all along that Iran is a dangerous nuclear threat. Where will that nuke be detonated? Opinions vary, from the Golden Gate bridge to the aging and about-to-be-retired USS Enterprise. But given that Israel obtained their first weapons-grade fissionables here in the United States, the possability that they already have a bomb inside our borders cannot be ruled out.

But of one thing I am certain. This current provocation of anger across the Middle East could well be the warm up to Israel’s final push to trick the stupid Muslims and stupid Christians into killing each other off.

Please, don’t be stupid.

UPDATE: The Christian Science Monitor is reporting that aside from the 14 minute clip posted to the internet, this supposed Mohammed-bashing movie does not seem to exist. Supporting the theory that this is a propaganda hoax, and given the statements made by the cast and crew that they were unaware that the movie they were hired to make was so imflammatory, it now appears that someone took the footage from the movie that was being made, “Desert Warrior” and repurposed it for this 14 minute clip. But there is no actual movie.

Origianlly posted at: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/suchafuss.php

If you want to learn something, then this is worth the read. I don’t remember where I got this but, it was a while back. I’ll post some more of this soon.

WHATS REAL AND WHATS NOT

Most Americans know the mainstream media manipulates stories, manufactures illusions, and exploits fears. But the reason is more than just liberal bias or sloppy reporting. Behind the Big News exposes a revolutionary agenda originating outside the media that defines today’s headlines. This powerful and fast-paced video examines some of the biggest news stories in recent decades to discover how this subversive agenda is promoted. Behind the Big News also reveals an effective strategy to overcome this ongoing assault on American freedom. CLICK HERE

Let’s start with this: Money has two factors that define it. It is a thing of beauty if you’re mathematically or even poetically inclined, because it’s not one and it’s not three. There are two specific factors that indicate anything is money and they are:
#1: It has to have intrinsic value; and
#2: It can’t vary in quality.

That’s it. Everything in creation that has these two conditions, is money. Everything that doesn’t, isn’t.

Gold and silver have always been considered money in the history of mankind in all cultures because they meet the two conditions, plus they’re handy. Actually, every element in the chemistry table of elements other than carbon is money. Water is money. The only reason you don’t see people carrying gallons of water to the store to pay for things is because it’s not handy.

Diamonds aren’t money because, though they have intrinsic value, they vary in quality.

Federal Reserve Notes are not money because they don’t have any intrinsic value. They cost two cents to make regardless of denomination. That’s an obvious shocker to a lot of people – the fact that someone actually makes a 98 cent profit on every dollar bill; a $99.98 profit on every $100 bill.

Presuming it is the government that does this (actually it’s not – the Federal Reserve is no more federal than Federal Express – more on that at another time), one might wonder why it (the government) needs so much money in taxes, license & permit fees, citations, fines & penalties and confiscations, and all the other perhaps subtler methods it uses to remove us from our property.

Federal Reserve Notes are negotiable instruments that discharge debt, but they are not money. They are not backed by silver anymore like they were in the days of the silver certificates, nor are they backed by any other commodity that meets the definition of money. The collateral for Federal Reserve Notes is the future labor of the people of theUnited Statesas evidenced by the birth certificates. That’s a very loaded sentence that we will go into more in a minute, but one of the keywords is future. In other words it doesn’t exist now, it may exist later. So Federal Reserve notes are in that category of negotiable instruments called “promises to pay” or promissory notes. They are debt instruments.

In reality, we can’t actually pay any debts anymore because all of the real money has been extracted from society. All we can do now is discharge debts. All we have to do is use this fake money or counterfeit money. Federal Reserve Notes are counterfeit money.

You may have noticed that there are so many other examples of real things that have pretty much been replaced by their fake counterparts in the past few generations. Prior to this century, for instance, the only kind of food that existed was real – now it is quite a challenge to go into a regular grocery store and buy any food that has not been polluted by chemicals, insecticides, genetic engineering or over-processing to an incredible extent. Some people don’t even know that real maple syrup comes from a tree. The brown sugar water with chemicals in it that you are served in the House of Pancakes may look like syrup, but it isn’t.

In a similar fashion, and just like we used to have real money rather than fake money, we used to have real laws (implementing regulations), rather than fake laws like Codes (color of law) that are only applicable to corporate fictions. We also used to have real titles to property rather than fake titles like deeds (color of title). If you really own your land and have an allodial title to it, you are not subject to building codes or property taxes. If you only have a deed, the STATE really owns your land, and if you don’t pay the rent (property taxes), they will take it away from you. You can be assured that Mr. Rockefeller has real title to his property.

There are two of so many things these days – one that is real and one that is fake.

There are two “states” of whatever state you live in. There is one that has hills and valleys and rocks and trees and dogs and cats and people in it. There is another one that is a government entity, a corporate fiction. When you fill out a government form that asks you “Are you a resident of the State of Connecticut?”, you may presume you know what is meant by the word “resident” and the phrase “State of Connecticut”, but you should be sure before you sign that thing under penalty of perjury.

In the same way, there are in a way two of you. The real you was created by your mother and father and God, and if somebody pinches, you will feel it. There is another “you”, believe it or not, that was created by the STATE and is a corporate fiction.

Have you ever noticed that whenever you receive a letter from a creditor or debt collector or IRS, it’s always addressed to your name in all capital letters? Well, that’s because that letter is not addressed to you but to your STRAWMAN. On your personal checks issued to you by your bank, your name and address are imprinted in all capital letters for the same reason.

You may decide you want to have the best mailbox on your block, so you design and construct and paint this fabulous mailbox and you take it out in front of your mansion and you pound it in to the ground on your property. Who owns that mailbox? If one of your neighbors puts a letter in that mailbox that does not have a stamp on it, they can be fined or imprisoned for trespassing on government property.

In the same way, you may have a birth certificate in your possession – it has your name on it – you’ve had it for decades – you value it – you keep it in your box of important documents. Guess who owns that birth certificate. Of course, it is the STATE who owns that birth certificate. At the very best, you may get a certified copy. The original is always kept in the Bureau of Vital Records in the State you were born, in the Department of Commerce. Do you know why in the Department of Commerce? Because your birth certificate, along with all the other birth certificates, is the collateral for Federal Reserve Notes.

Effectively, your birth certificate is the STATE’s certificate of title over you.

Now, how did you become chattel property of the STATE (being as the Constitution supposedly forbids slavery)? The short answer is by deceit and trickery. The STATE created a corporate fiction, your STRAWMAN with that birth certificate, and as long as you don’t know the difference between that STRAWMAN and you the real, live human being, the least common denominator is the STRAWMAN.

When you’re driving on the street, perhaps at a higher speed than the posted so-called speed limit, but you haven’t done any personal or property damage, the reason a cop can stop you, hand you a bill at gun point, and deny your rights to travel and due process in one fell swoop, is because the cop is not dealing with you the real, live human being, but only with the STRAWMAN.

Remember we were taught back in the 8th Grade that there are three branches of government – the Executive, the Judicial and the Legislative? Well, where does the DMV or the IRS fit into that? They don’t. They’re in what some people have come to call the quasi-Fourth branch of government – the Administrative agencies. The Administrative agencies would like you to believe they have legislative authority over you. They don’t. The only authority or jurisdiction they can claim to have is in commerce, by contract, over corporate fictions.

The real you has God-given rights. It doesn’t matter whether you live in a country with a Constitution that supposedly protects those rights or not. You have God-given rights just by being here. The fake “you”, the corporate fiction or STRAWMAN, doesn’t have any God-given rights, only benefits and obligations under contract, and maybe “civil rights”, a poor substitute (fake) for real rights.

Civil rights may be politically correct, but they are counter to nature and real rights. For instance it may be a civil right not to be discriminated against because you have a pointy nose, but the deeper (real, God-given) right is the right to associate with anyone you want to and not to have to associate in any way with anyone you don’t want to. If you don’t want to hire pointy nosed people just because you don’t like pointy nosed people, that is your God-given right.

God-given rights include the rights to livelihood, property, travel, due process, sovereignty, happiness and health. These are not STATE privileges.

Knowledge really is power. It is important to know the difference between what is real and what is fake, and it is also good to know the rules. There are Constitutional experts in jail because they didn’t understand how they had contracted away their God-given rights in exchange for STATE privileges. It’s important to be familiar with the Uniform Commercial Code, because this is the real rules on planet Earth.

One of the ten basic maxims of Commercial law is this: “An unrebutted Affidavit is presumed to be true”. What this means is that whenever you get a bill, a fine, a penalty, assessment, or demand or presentment in commerce of any sort, it behooves you to respond to it timely, because if you don’t – if you ignore it, you acquiesce to the truth of it. You loose your due process, and it may not have been true at all in the first place.

The better way to play the commerce game is to respond timely and request that your adversary respond timely to you as well. Oftentimes it is ridiculously easy to pull the rug out from under an IRS agent or a debt collector simply by making a righteous formal request that they cannot or will not respond to.

Did you know that there is no law that makes it mandatory for any real, live human being to pay income taxes, have income taxes withheld from one’s pay, or even file tax returns? How could there be? It is an obvious fact, and the Supreme Court has ruled very clearly that when you file an income tax return, you are waiving your 5th Amendment Right to not testify against yourself. Certainly there can be no law that makes it mandatory that anyone waive any rights.

When many people get an inquiry from IRS asking them where their tax return is, they panic and ignore it, and six weeks later they get an unsigned assessment that contains added in fines and penalties – they’re on the way to being liened or levied. [Actually, the IRS never sends out real liens – only “Notices” of liens, but they usually get theCountyRecordersto treat them as real liens anyway.]

When you get a letter from IRS asking you where your tax return is, you might write back very humbly, simply and immediately and give them Power of Attorney to complete your tax return for you as long as they sign it under penalty of perjury – you may never hear from them again.

Another way to illustrate using the maxim “An un-rebutted Affidavit is presumed to be true” is also an easy way to explain one approach to terminating unsecured debt.

Did you know that banks do not issue loans? This is a shocker to many people, because we are taught to believe that if we want a loan, we go to a bank. But banks don’t issue loans and there is no asterisk on that sentence. Banks are prohibited from loaning their customer’s assets because that would violate General Accounting principles. They are prohibited from loaning their own assets because that would violate Federal Reserve Regulations. What’s left? Nothing. Banks don’t issue loans.

What happens is when you leave the bank with a credit card application or another type of co-called loan application, you are actually giving the bank your promise to pay them with your signature on it. It could be on a piece of toilet paper. It is a promissory note that the bank cashes, and in a simple example, gives you a check of equal value in return. They don’t disclose that there wasn’t really any loan or any risk or collateral on their part and that they merely paid a clerk $12 an hour or so to make an entry in a computer. [This is what causes inflation because the so-called money is created out of thin air.] Then they (the banks) violate usury and racketeering laws all day every day by charging you principle and interest on the fictitious “loan”.

One way to terminate this unsecured debt, without bankruptcy, is: when your STRAWMAN gets the bill, send in a minimum payment with a cover letter that says at the top “Notice of Final Payment”. In this half a page cover letter, make a formal request in commerce, that they (the so-called creditor) answer your question, and your question is where was the risk or the collateral for that so-called loan.

Well, again, there was no loan; there was no risk, and there was no collateral. They can’t answer that question, and you end up creating a new contract in which your STRAWMAN doesn’t owe them anything anymore that replaces the old contract in which your STRAWMAN might have owed them thousands of dollars. This new contract is called a novation.

Evading responsibility is not being advocated by these prior statements. Certainly if you have made a mess, it is up to you to clean it up. But if the mess you’ve made is a merely a mirage, it is appropriate to handle it by mirage means.

Step by step over the last few decades, the substance of our money, our laws, our rights and our freedoms have been overlayed by something resembling but counter to these precious things.

Our society has become a tyrannical police state. Still however, it is our ability to be truly free human beings because it is our birthright – it just takes more knowledge then ever, and action, to step out of the negative spell that has been cast by the conspiratorial powers that be.

The laying of the groundwork to one’s freedom and sovereignty requires dotting all of the “i”s and crossing all of the “t”s and at least three steps:

1. Properly filing a UCC-1 form to establish a public record that you are not the STRAWMAN and in fact are the holder-in-due-course of it. This is the single most important tool in your toolbag because this alone changes the presumption of law from the side of the STATE to your side;
2. Making you the Power of Attorney over the corporate fiction; and
3. Copyrighting the STRAWMAN’s name. This doesn’t just give you another defensive strategy – it gives you a very important offensive weapon, because from this point on, anyone who is coming after your STRAWMAN for anything without your permission is trespassing on your commercial property.

You’ve possibly heard of the term “judicial immunity” a judge has, or so-called “unlimited immunity” a clerk or a cop or an IRS agent has protected by his or her agency. Well, it hardly exists at all. The only immunity any agent has is when they are within their jurisdiction, and they have no jurisdiction over you the real live person.

When you know the difference between who you are and who you’ve been led to believe you are (a corporate fiction) and how to effectively assert this difference, the scales of justice are unlocked and the balance of power tilts back to your favor.

For every step forward there are two steps back. As always we never get the truth from MSM.

 

Record 1.2 Million People Fall Out Of Labor Force In One Month, Labor Force Participation Rate Tumbles To Fresh 30 Year Low

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/03/2012 08:51 -0500

A month ago, we joked when we said that for Obama to get the unemployment rate to negative by election time, all he has to do is to crush the labor force participation rate to about 55%. Looks like the good folks at the BLS heard us: it appears that the people not in the labor force exploded by an unprecedented record 1.2 million. No, that’s not a typo: 1.2 million people dropped out of the labor force in one month! So as the labor force increased from 153.9 million to 154.4 million, the non institutional population increased by 242.3 million meaning, those not in the labor force surged from 86.7 million to 87.9 million.

Read More: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/record-12-million-people-fall-out-labor-force-one-month-labor-force-participation-rate-tumbles

Mitt Romney News & Insight

 

 

Mitt your first priority is America, we’ve given BILLIONS to Israel. We need the $$$ here, you live in the US and put it’s people first – right!!

http://www.jpost.com/International/Article.aspx?id=240955

If your going to do it to them then you better do to everyone. Which should be no one!! And who did 9 11 again??

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/09/15/wiretap_mosques_romney_suggests/?s_campaign=8315

Didn’t he just refuse to give finacial statements? Everyone knows a POZie Scam when they see one.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/19/us/politics/retirement-deal-keeps-bain-money-flowing-to-romney.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&ref=todayspaper&adxnnlx=1325200291-+omom8I+izHNu70fc76nxg

Can’t recall right now but, who was it that said only the stupid people pay taxes. The I-R-S is a banking scam it it’s own right and Mitt boy knows how to play it.

http://www.fitsnews.com/2011/12/23/mitt-romney-wont-release-tax-returns-2/

And by the way, I really, really trust the electronic computerized voting machines!!!

 

In t r o d u c t i o n: The following article was commissioned by the Christian Science Monitor in the spring of 1997. Despite much favorable comment from editors, and full documentation, the story remains unpublished by the Monitor. By any yardstick, this report was an award-winning scoop for any national paper. The report offers a glimpse into the history of fluoride, a bio-accumulative toxic that Americans ingest every day. The authors, Griffiths and Bryson, spent more than a year on research. With the belief that the information should be withheld no longer, the authors gave their report to Waste Not, and others, with a short note: “use as you wish.”

This introduction is taken from Waste Not #414 (September 1997) where the article was first published. The article went on to be nominated as the year’s 18th most censored story in the 1998 Project Censored Series.

 

Fluoride, Teeth, and the Atomic Bomb
by Chris Bryson & Joel Griffiths

 

Some fifty years after the United States began adding fluoride to public water supplies to reduce cavities in children’s teeth, declassified government documents are shedding new light on the roots of that still-controversial public health measure, revealing a surprising connection between fluoride and the dawning of the nuclear age.

Today, two thirds of U.S. public drinking water is fluoridated. Many municipalities still resist the practice, disbelieving the government’s assurances of safety.

Since the days of World War II, when this nation prevailed by building the world’s first atomic bomb, U.S. public health leaders have maintained that low doses of fluoride are safe for people, and good for children’s teeth.

That safety verdict should now be re-examined in the light of hundreds of once-secret WWII documents obtained by Griffiths and Bryson –including declassified papers of the Manhattan Project, the U.S. military group that built the atomic bomb.

Fluoride was the key chemical in atomic bomb production, according to the documents. Massive quantities of fluoride– millions of tons– were essential for the manufacture of bomb-grade uranium and plutonium for nuclear weapons throughout the Cold War. One of the most toxic chemicals known, fluoride rapidly emerged as the leading chemical health hazard of the U.S atomic bomb program–both for workers and for nearby communities, the documents reveal.

Other revelations include:

* Much of the original proof that fluoride is safe for humans in low doses was generated by A-bomb program scientists, who had been secretly ordered to provide “evidence useful in litigation” against defense contractors for fluoride injury to citizens. The first lawsuits against the U.S. A-bomb program were not over radiation, but over fluoride damage, the documents show.

* Human studies were required. Bomb program researchers played a leading role in the design and implementation of the most extensive U.S. study of the health effects of fluoridating public drinking water–conducted in Newburgh, New York from 1945 to 1956. Then, in a classified operation code-named “Program F,” they secretly gathered and analyzed blood and tissue samples from Newburgh citizens, with the cooperation of State Health Department personnel.

* The original secret version–obtained by these reporters–of a 1948 study published by Program F scientists in the Journal of the American Dental Association shows that evidence of adverse health effects from fluoride was censored by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) –considered the most powerful of Cold War agencies– for reasons of national security.

* The bomb program’s fluoride safety studies were conducted at the University of Rochester, site of one of the most notorious human radiation experiments of the Cold War, in which unsuspecting hospital patients were injected with toxic doses of radioactive plutonium. The fluoride studies were conducted with the same ethical mind-set, in which “national security” was paramount.

* The U.S. government’s conflict of interest–and its motive to prove fluoride “safe” — has not until now been made clear to the general public in the furious debate over water fluoridation since the 1950’s, nor to civilian researchers and health professionals, or journalists.

The declassified documents resonate with a growing body of scientific evidence, and a chorus of questions, about the health effects of fluoride in the environment.

Human exposure to fluoride has mushroomed since World War II, due not only to fluoridated water and toothpaste, but to environmental pollution by major industries from aluminum to pesticides: fluoride is a critical industrial chemical.

The impact can be seen, literally, in the smiles of our children. Large numbers of U.S. young people–up to 80 percent in some cities–now have dental fluorosis, the first visible sign of excessive fluoride exposure, according to the U.S. National Research Council. (The signs are whitish flecks or spots, particularly on the front teeth, or dark spots or stripes in more severe cases.)

Less-known to the public is that fluoride also accumulates in bones –“The teeth are windows to what’s happening in the bones,” explains Paul Connett, Professor of Chemistry at St. Lawrence University (N.Y.). In recent years, pediatric bone specialists have expressed alarm about an increase in stress fractures among U.S. young people. Connett and other scientists are concerned that fluoride –linked to bone damage by studies since the 1930’s– may be a contributing factor. The declassified documents add urgency: much of the original proof that low-dose fluoride is safe for children’s bones came from U.S. bomb program scientists, according to this investigation.

Now, researchers who have reviewed these declassified documents fear that Cold War national security considerations may have prevented objective scientific evaluation of vital public health questions concerning fluoride.

“Information was buried,” concludes Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, former head of toxicology at Forsyth Dental Center in Boston, and now a critic of fluoridation. Animal studies Mullenix and co-workers conducted at Forsyth in the early 1990’s indicated that fluoride was a powerful central nervous system (CNS) toxin, and might adversely affect human brain functioning, even at low doses. (New epidemiological evidence from China adds support, showing a correlation between low-dose fluoride exposure and diminished I.Q. in children.) Mullenix’s results were published in 1995, in a reputable peer-reviewed scientific journal.

During her investigation, Mullenix was astonished to discover there had been virtually no previous U.S. studies of fluoride’s effects on the human brain. Then, her application for a grant to continue her CNS research was turned down by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), where an NIH panel, she says, flatly told her that “fluoride does not have central nervous system effects.”

Declassified documents of the U.S. atomic-bomb program indicate otherwise. An April 29, 1944 Manhattan Project memo reports: “Clinical evidence suggests that uranium hexafluoride may have a rather marked central nervous system effect…. It seems most likely that the F component rather than the T is the causative factor.”

The memo –stamped “secret”– is addressed to the head of the Manhattan Project’s Medical Section, Colonel Stafford Warren. Colonel Warren is asked to approve a program of animal research on CNS effects: “Since work with these compounds is essential, it will be necessary to know in advance what mental effects may occur after exposure…This is important not only to protect a given individual, but also to prevent a confused workman from injuring others by improperly performing his duties.”

On the same day, Colonel Warren approved the CNS research program. This was in 1944, at the height of the Second World War and the nation’s race to build the world’s first atomic bomb. For research on fluoride’s CNS effects to be approved at such a momentous time, the supporting evidence set forth in the proposal forwarded along with the memo must have been persuasive.

The proposal, however, is missing from the files of the U.S. National Archives. “If you find the memos, but the document they refer to is missing, its probably still classified,” said Charles Reeves, chief librarian at the Atlanta branch of the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, where the memos were found. Similarly, no results of the Manhattan Project’s fluoride CNS research could be found in the files.

After reviewing the memos, Mullenix declared herself “flabbergasted.” She went on, “How could I be told by NIH that fluoride has no central nervous system effects when these documents were sitting there all the time?” She reasons that the Manhattan Project did do fluoride CNS studies –“that kind of warning, that fluoride workers might be a danger to the bomb program by improperly performing their duties–I can’t imagine that would be ignored”– but that the results were buried because they might create a difficult legal and public relations problem for the government.

The author of the 1944 CNS research proposal was Dr. Harold C. Hodge, at the time chief of fluoride toxicology studies for the University of Rochester division of the Manhattan Project. Nearly fifty years later at the Forsyth Dental Center in Boston, Dr. Mullenix was introduced to a gently ambling elderly man brought in to serve as a consultant on her CNS research–Harold C. Hodge. By then Hodge had achieved status emeritus as a world authority on fluoride safety. “But even though he was supposed to be helping me,” says Mullenix, “he never once mentioned the CNS work he had done for the Manhattan Project.”

The “black hole” in fluoride CNS research since the days of the Manhattan Project is unacceptable to Mullenix, who refuses to abandon the issue. “There is so much fluoride exposure now, and we simply do not know what it is doing,” she says. “You can’t just walk away from this.”

Dr. Antonio Noronha, an NIH scientific review advisor familiar with Dr. Mullenix’s grant request, says her proposal was rejected by a scientific peer-review group. He terms her claim of institutional bias against fluoride CNS research “farfetched.” He adds, “We strive very hard at NIH to make sure politics does not enter the picture.”

Fluoride and National Security

The documentary trail begins at the height of WW2, in 1944, when a severe pollution incident occurred downwind of the E.I. du Pont du Nemours Company chemical factory in Deepwater, New Jersey. The factory was then producing millions of pounds of fluoride for the Manhattan project, the ultra-secret U.S. military program racing to produce the world’s first atomic bomb.

The farms downwind in Gloucester and Salem counties were famous for their high-quality produce — their peaches went directly to the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in New York. Their tomatoes were bought up by Campbell’s Soup.

But in the summer of 1943, the farmers began to report that their crops were blighted, and that “something is burning up the peach crops around here.”

Poultry died after an all-night thunderstorm, they reported. Farm workers who ate the produce they had picked sometimes vomited all night and into the next day. “I remember our horses looked sick and were too stiff to work,” these reporters were told by Mildred Giordano, who was a teenager at the time. Some cows were so crippled they could not stand up, and grazed by crawling on their bellies.

The account was confirmed in taped interviews, shortly before he died, with Philip Sadtler of Sadtler Laboratories of Philadelphia, one of the nation’s oldest chemical consulting firms. Sadtler had personally conducted the initial investigation of the damage.

Although the farmers did not know it, the attention of the Manhattan Project and the federal government was riveted on the New Jersey incident, according to once-secret documents obtained by these reporters. After the war’s end, in a secret Manhattan Project memo dated March 1, 1946, the Project’s chief of fluoride toxicology studies, Harold C. Hodge, worriedly wrote to his boss Colonel Stafford L. Warren, Chief of the Medical Division, about “problems associated with the question of fluoride contamination of the atmosphere in a certain section of New Jersey. There seem to be four distinct (though related) problems,” continued Hodge;

 

1. A question of injury of the peach crop in 1944.

2. A report of extraordinary fluoride content of vegetables grown in this area.

3. A report of abnormally high fluoride content in the blood of human individuals residing in this area.

4. A report raising the question of serious poisoning of horses and cattle in this area.

 

The New Jersey farmers waited until the war was over, then sued du Pont and the Manhattan Project for fluoride damage — reportedly the first lawsuits against the U.S. A-bomb program.

Although seemingly trivial, the lawsuits shook the government, the secret documents reveal. Under the personal direction of Manhattan Project chief Major General Leslie R.Groves, secret meetings were convened in Washington, with compulsory attendance by scores of scientists and officials from the U.S War Department, the Manhattan Project, the Food and Drug Administration, the Agriculture and Justice Departments, the U.S Army’s Chemical Warfare Service and Edgewood Arsenal, the Bureau of Standards, and du Pont lawyers. Declassified memos of the meetings reveal a secret mobilization of the full forces of the government to defeat the New Jersey farmers:

These agencies “are making scientific investigations to obtain evidence which may be used to protect the interest of the Government at the trial of the suits brought by owners of peach orchards in … New Jersey,” stated Manhattan Project Lieutenant Colonel Cooper B. Rhodes, in a memo c.c.’d to General Groves.

 

27 August 1945

Subject: Investigation of Crop Damage at Lower Penns Neck, New Jersey
To: The Commanding General, Army Service Forces, Pentagon Building, Washington D.C.

“At the request of the Secretary of War the Department of Agriculture has agreed to cooperate in investigating complaints of crop damage attributed… to fumes from a plant operated in connection with the Manhattan Project.”

Signed, L.R. Groves, Major General U.S.

 

“The Department of Justice is cooperating in the defense of these suits,” wrote General Groves in a Feb. 28, 1946 memo to the Chairman of the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Atomic Energy.

Why the national-security emergency over a few lawsuits by New Jersey farmers? In 1946 the United States had begun full-scale production of atomic bombs. No other nation had yet tested a nuclear weapon, and the A-bomb was seen as crucial for U.S leadership of the postwar world. The New Jersey fluoride lawsuits were a serious roadblock to that strategy.

“The specter of endless lawsuits haunted the military,” writes Lansing Lamont in his acclaimed book about the first atomic bomb test, “Day of Trinity.”

In the case of fluoride, “If the farmers won, it would open the door to further suits, which might impede the bomb program’s ability to use fluoride,” said Jacqueline Kittrell, a Tennessee public interest lawyer specializing in nuclear cases, who examined the declassified fluoride documents. (Kittrell has represented plaintiffs in several human radiation experiment cases.) She added, “The reports of human injury were especially threatening, because of the potential for enormous settlements — not to mention the PR problem.”

Indeed, du Pont was particularly concerned about the “possible psychologic reaction” to the New Jersey pollution incident, according to a secret 1946 Manhattan Project memo. Facing a threat from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to embargo the region’s produce because of “high fluoride content,” du Pont dispatched its lawyers to the FDA offices in Washington, where an agitated meeting ensued. According to a memo sent next day to General Groves, Du Pont’s lawyer argued “that in view of the pending suits…any action by the Food and Drug Administration… would have a serious effect on the du Pont Company and would create a bad public relations situation.” After the meeting adjourned, Manhattan Project Captain John Davies approached the FDA’s Food Division chief and “impressed upon Dr. White the substantial interest which the Government had in claims which might arise as a result of action which might be taken by the Food and Drug Administration.”

There was no embargo. Instead, new tests for fluoride in the New Jersey area would be conducted — not by the Department of Agriculture — but by the U.S. Army’s Chemical Warfare Service because “work done by the Chemical Warfare Service would carry the greatest weight as evidence if… lawsuits are started by the complainants.” The memo was signed by General Groves.

Meanwhile, the public relations problem remained unresolved — local citizens were in a panic about fluoride.

The farmer’s spokesman, Willard B. Kille, was personally invited to dine with General Groves –then known as “the man who built the atomic bomb” — at his office at the War Department on March 26, 1946. Although he had been diagnosed with fluoride poisoning by his doctor, Kille departed the luncheon convinced of the government’s good faith. The next day he wrote to the general, wishing the other farmers could have been present, he said, so “they too could come away with the feeling that their interests in this particular matter were being safeguarded by men of the very highest type whose integrity they could not question.”

In a subsequent secret Manhattan project memo, a broader solution to the public relations problem was suggested by chief fluoride toxicologist Harold C. Hodge. He wrote to the Medical Section chief, Col. Warren: “Would there be any use in making attempts to counteract the local fear of fluoride on the part of residents of Salem and Gloucester counties through lectures on F toxicology and perhaps the usefulness of F in tooth health?” Such lectures were indeed given, not only to New Jersey citizens but to the rest of the nation throughout the Cold War.

The New Jersey farmers’ lawsuits were ultimately stymied by the government’s refusal to reveal the key piece of information that would have settled the case –how much fluoride du Pont had vented into the atmosphere during the war. “Disclosure… would be injurious to the military security of the United States,” wrote Manhattan Project Major C.A Taney, Jr. The farmers were pacified with token financial settlements, according to interviews with descendants still living in the area.

“All we knew is that du Pont released some chemical that burned up all the peach trees around here,” recalls Angelo Giordano, whose father James was one of the original plaintiffs. “The trees were no good after that, so we had to give up on the peaches.” Their horses and cows, too, acted stiff and walked stiff, recalls his sister Mildred. “Could any of that have been the fluoride ?” she asked. (The symptoms she detailed to the authors are cardinal signs of fluoride toxicity, according to veterinary toxicologists.)

The Giordano family, too, has been plagued by bone and joint problems, Mildred adds. Recalling the settlement received by the Giordanos, Angelo told these reporters that “my father said he got about $200.”

The farmers were stonewalled in their search for information, and their complaints have long since been forgotten. But they unknowingly left their imprint on history — their claims of injury to their health reverberated through the corridors of power in Washington, and triggered intensive secret bomb-program research on the health effects of fluoride. A secret 1945 memo from Manhattan Project Lt. Col. Rhodes to General Groves stated: “Because of complaints that animals and humans have been injured by hydrogen fluoride fumes in [the New Jersey] area, although there are no pending suits involving such claims, the University of Rochester is conducting experiments to determine the toxic effect of fluoride.”

Much of the proof of fluoride’s safety in low doses rests on the postwar work performed by the University of Rochester, in anticipation of lawsuits against the bomb program for human injury.

Fluoride and the Cold War.

Delegating fluoride safety studies to the University of Rochester was not surprising. During WWII the federal government had become involved, for the first time, in large-scale funding of scientific research at government-owned labs and private colleges. Those early spending priorities were shaped by the nation’s often-secret military needs.

The prestigious upstate New York college, in particular, had housed a key wartime division of the Manhattan Project, studying the health effects of the new “special materials,” such as uranium, plutonium, beryllium and fluoride, being used to make the atomic bomb. That work continued after the war, with millions of dollars flowing from the Manhattan Project and its successor organization, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). (Indeed, the bomb left an indelible imprint on all U.S. science in the late 1940’s and 50’s. Up to 90% of federal funds for university research came from either the Defense Department or the AEC in this period, according to Noam Chomsky’s 1996 book “The Cold War and the University.”)

The University of Rochester medical school became a revolving door for senior bomb program scientists. Postwar faculty included Stafford Warren, the top medical officer of the Manhattan Project, and Harold Hodge, chief of fluoride research for the bomb program.

But this marriage of military secrecy and medical science bore deformed offspring. The University of Rochester’s classified fluoride studies — code- named Program F — were conducted at its Atomic Energy Project (AEP), a top-secret facility funded by the AEC and housed in Strong Memorial Hospital. It was there that one of the most notorious human radiation experiments of the Cold War took place, in which unsuspecting hospital patients were injected with toxic doses of radioactive plutonium. Revelation of this experiment in a Pulitzer prize-winning account by Eileen Welsome led to a 1995 U.S. Presidential investigation, and a multimillion-dollar cash settlement for victims.

Program F was not about children’s teeth. It grew directly out of litigation against the bomb program and its main purpose was to furnish scientific ammunition which the government and its nuclear contractors could use to defeat lawsuits for human injury. Program F’s director was none other than Harold C. Hodge, who had led the Manhattan Project investigation of alleged human injury in the New Jersey fluoride-pollution incident.

Program F’s purpose is spelled out in a classified 1948 report. It reads: “To supply evidence useful in the litigation arising from an alleged loss of a fruit crop several years ago, a number of problems have been opened. Since excessive blood fluoride levels were reported in human residents of the same area, our principal effort has been devoted to describing the relationship of blood fluorides to toxic effects.”

The litigation referred to, of course, and the claims of human injury were against the bomb program and its contractors. Thus, the purpose of Program F was to obtain evidence useful in litigation against the bomb program. The research was being conducted by the defendants.

The potential conflict of interest is clear. If lower dose ranges were found hazardous by Program F, it might have opened the bomb program and its contractors to lawsuits for injury to human health, as well as public outcry.

Comments lawyer Kittrell: “This and other documents indicate that the University of Rochester’s fluoride research grew out of the New Jersey lawsuits and was performed in anticipation of lawsuits against the bomb program for human injury. Studies undertaken for litigation purposes by the defendants would not be considered scientifically acceptable today, ” adds Kittrell, “because of their inherent bias to prove the chemical safe.”

Unfortunately, much of the proof of fluoride’s safety rests on the work performed by Program F Scientists at the University of Rochester. During the postwar period that university emerged as the leading academic center for establishing the safety of fluoride, as well as its effectiveness in reducing tooth decay, according to Dental School spokesperson William H. Bowen, MD. The key figure in this research, Bowen said, was Harold C. Hodge– who also became a leading national proponent of fluoridating public drinking water. Program F’s interest in water fluoridation was not just ‘to counteract the local fear of fluoride on the part of residents,’ as Hodge had earlier written. The bomb program needed human studies, as they had needed human studies for plutonium, and adding fluoride to public water supplies provided one opportunity.

The A-Bomb Program and Water Fluoridation

Bomb-program scientists played a prominent — if unpublicized — role in the nation’s first-planned water fluoridation experiment, in Newburgh, New York. The Newburgh Demonstration Project is considered the most extensive study of the health effects of fluoridation, supplying much of the evidence that low doses are safe for children’s bones, and good for their teeth.

Planning began in 1943 with the appointment of a special New York State Health Department committee to study the advisability of adding fluoride to Newburgh’s drinking water. The chairman of the committee was Dr. Hodge, then chief of fluoride toxicity studies for the Manhattan Project.

Subsequent members included Henry L. Barnett, a captain in the Project’s Medical section, and John W. Fertig, in 1944 with the office of Scientific Research and Development, the Pentagon group which sired the Manhattan Project. Their military affiliations were kept secret: Hodge was described as a pharmacologist, Barnett as a pediatrician. Placed in charge of the Newburgh project was David B. Ast, chief dental officer of the State Health Department. Ast had participated in a key secret wartime conference on fluoride held by the Manhattan Project, and later worked with Dr. Hodge on the Project’s investigation of human injury in the New Jersey incident, according to once-secret memos.

The committee recommended that Newburgh be fluoridated. It also selected the types of medical studies to be done, and “provided expert guidance” for the duration of the experiment. The key question to be answered was: “Are there any cumulative effects — beneficial or otherwise, on tissues and organs other than the teeth — of long-continued ingestion of such small concentrations…?” According to the declassified documents, this was also key information sought by the bomb program, which would require long-continued exposure of workers and communities to fluoride throughout the Cold War.

In May 1945, Newburgh’s water was fluoridated, and over the next ten years its residents were studied by the State Health Department. In tandem, Program F conducted its own secret studies, focusing on the amounts of fluoride Newburgh citizens retained in their blood and tissues – key information sought by the bomb program: “Possible toxic effects of fluoride were in the forefront of consideration,” the advisory committee stated. Health Department personnel cooperated, shipping blood and placenta samples to the Program F team at the University of Rochester. The samples were collected by Dr. David B. Overton, the Department’s chief of pediatric studies at Newburgh.

The final report of the Newburgh Demonstration Project, published in 1956 in the Journal of the American Dental Association, concluded that “small concentrations” of fluoride were safe for U.S.citizens. The biological proof — “based on work performed … at the University of Rochester Atomic Energy Project” — was delivered by Dr. Hodge.

Today, news that scientists from the atomic bomb program secretly shaped and guided the Newburgh fluoridation experiment, and studied the citizen’s blood and tissue samples, is greeted with incredulity.

“I’m shocked — beyond words,” said present-day Newburgh Mayor Audrey Carey, commenting on these reporters’ findings. “It reminds me of the Tuskegee experiment that was done on syphilis patients down in Alabama.”

As a child in the early 1950’s, Mayor Carey was taken to the old firehouse on Broadway in Newburgh, which housed the Public Health Clinic. There, doctors from the Newburgh fluoridation project studied her teeth, and a peculiar fusion of two finger bones on her left hand she had been born with. Today, adds Carey, her granddaughter has white dental-fluorosis marks on her front teeth.

Mayor Carey wants answers from the government about the secret history of fluoride, and the Newburgh fluoridation experiment. “I absolutely want to pursue it,” she said. “It is appalling to do any kind of experimentation and study without people’s knowledge and permission.”

Contacted by these reporters, the director of the Newburgh experiment, David B. Ast, says he was unaware Manhattan Project scientists were involved. “If I had known, I would have been certainly investigating why, and what the connection was,” he said. Did he know that blood and placenta samples from Newburgh were being sent to bomb program researchers at the University of Rochester? “I was not aware of it,” Ast replied. Did he recall participating in the Manhattan Project’s secret wartime conference on fluoride in January 1944, or going to New Jersey with Dr. Hodge to investigate human injury in the du Pont case–as secret memos state? He told the reporters he had no recollection of these events.

A spokesperson for the University of Rochester Medical Center, Bob Loeb, confirmed that blood and tissue samples from Newburgh had been tested by the University’s Dr. Hodge. On the ethics of secretly studying U.S citizens to obtain information useful in litigation against the A-bomb program, he said, “that’s a question we cannot answer.” He referred inquiries to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), successor to the Atomic Energy Commission.

A spokesperson for the DOE in Washington, Jayne Brady, confirmed that a review of DOE files indicated that a “significant reason” for fluoride experiments conducted at the University of Rochester after the war was “impending litigation between the du Pont company and residents of New Jersey areas.” However, she added, “DOE has found no documents to indicate that fluoride research was done to protect the Manhattan Project or its contractors from lawsuits.”

On Manhattan Project involvement in Newburgh, the spokesperson stated, “Nothing that we have suggests that the DOE or predecessor agencies — especially the Manhattan Project — authorized fluoride experiments to be performed on children in the 1940’s.”

When told that the reporters had several documents that directly tied the Manhattan Project’s successor agency at the University of Rochester, the AEP, to the Newburgh experiment, the DOE spokesperson later conceded her study was confined to “the available universe” of documents. Two days later spokesperson Jayne Brady faxed a statement for clarification: “My search only involved the documents that we collected as part of our human radiation experiments project — fluoride was not part of our research effort.

“Most significantly,” the statement continued, relevant documents may be in a classified collection at the DOE Oak Ridge National Laboratory known as the Records Holding Task Group. “This collection consists entirely of classified documents removed from other files for the purpose of classified document accountability many years ago,” and was “a rich source of documents for the human radiation experiments project,” she said.

The crucial question arising from this investigation is: Were adverse health findings from Newburgh and other bomb-program fluoride studies suppressed? All AEC-funded studies had to be declassified before publication in civilian medical and dental journals. Where are the original classified versions?

The transcript of one of the major secret scientific conferences of WW2–on “fluoride metabolism”–is missing from the files of the U.S. National Archives. Participants in the conference included key figures who promoted the safety of fluoride and water fluoridation to the public after the war – Harold Hodge of the Manhattan Project, David B. Ast of the Newburgh Project, and U.S. Public Health Service dentist H.Trendley Dean, popularly known as the “father of fluoridation.” “If it is missing from the files, it is probably still classified,” National Archives librarians told these reporters.

A 1944 WW2 Manhattan Project classified report on water fluoridation is missing from the files of the University of Rochester Atomic Energy Project, the U.S. National Archives, and the Nuclear Repository at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. The next four numerically consecutive documents are also missing, while the remainder of the “MP-1500 series” is present. “Either those documents are still classified, or they’ve been ‘disappeared’ by the government,” says Clifford Honicker, Executive Director of the American Environmental Health Studies Project, in Knoxville, Tennessee, which provided key evidence in the public exposure and prosecution of U.S. human radiation experiments.

Seven pages have been cut out of a 1947 Rochester bomb-project notebook entitled “Du Pont litigation.” “Most unusual,” commented chief medical school archivist Chris Hoolihan.

Similarly, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by these authors over a year ago with the DOE for hundreds of classified fluoride reports have failed to dislodge any. “We’re behind,” explained Amy Rothrock, FOIA officer for the Department of Energy at their Oak Ridge operations.

Was information suppressed? These reporters made what appears to be the first discovery of the original classified version of a fluoride safety study by bomb program scientists. A censored version of this study was later published in the August 1948 Journal of the American Dental Association. Comparison of the secret with the published version indicates that the U.S. AEC did censor damaging information on fluoride, to the point of tragicomedy.

This was a study of the dental and physical health of workers in a factory producing fluoride for the A-bomb program, conducted by a team of dentists from the Manhattan Project.

*
The secret version reports that most of the men had no teeth left. The published version reports only that the men had fewer cavities.

*
The secret version says the men had to wear rubber boots because the fluoride fumes disintegrated the nails in their shoes. The published version does not mention this.

*
The secret version says the fluoride may have acted similarly on the men’s teeth, contributing to their toothlessness. The published version omits this statement.

The published version concludes that “the men were unusually healthy, judged from both a medical and dental point of view.”

Asked for comment on the early links of the Manhattan Project to water fluoridation, Dr Harold Slavkin, Director of the National Institute for Dental Research, the U.S. agency which today funds fluoride research, said, “I wasn’t aware of any input from the Atomic Energy Commission.” Nevertheless, he insisted, fluoride’s efficacy and safety in the prevention of dental cavities over the last fifty years is well-proved. “The motivation of a scientist is often different from the outcome, ” he reflected. “I do not hold a prejudice about where the knowledge comes from.”

After comparing the secret and published versions of the censored study, toxicologist Phyllis Mullenix commented, “This makes me ashamed to be a scientist.” Of other Cold War-era fluoride safety studies, she asks, “Were they all done like this?”

http://www.fluoridealert.org/wastenot414.htm

 


 


 I have a tendency to side with this comment posted on the site (below). They play the game of creating news to cover what they don’t want you to know. I read about this “site” site a while back, surprised that it still provided info after the negative exposure. This is an example of what the controlled media does to distract readers from a more relevant matter.

“Big Distraction no matter who it traces back to. Pres. and VP both are deeply negative in current news cycle. Repubs riding a high wave. Suddenly Letterman is all the “news”. Come on, is everyone getting that old so quickly? Letterman always plays to the highest bidder. Pres is hurting election wise, Letterman is saying, “hey everyone, look over here”

Also over rode the news of the economy and wall street drop. As I have always said, “Look for what is not there, and should be”. In this case, the truth.”

Letterman, is that a jewish name?

We find no evidence of any qualification whatsoever of any kind. A bartender has more intelligence gathering experience than Rita Katz.

(LINK) http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/18/phony-letterman-threat-tracked-to-israeli-site/