Tag Archive: Nuclear


nuke is

 

If, and I mean if this has any validity (using nukes) there’s a whole new game of war starting. Start small and escalate to the major weapons of destruction. The conflict in the middle east is out of control and I think that many leading officials around the world are waking up to this fact. Are we on a path of destruction that will finally come home to roost here on US soil. It certainly is starting to look that way. We can not keep the charade of being the protector going much longer. The US seems to be putting the noose around it’s own neck, time is short, hold on to your hats ladies and gentlemen, this isn’t good.

Start below at about 15 min in:

 

Striking evidence of the use of American EPW (Earth Penetrating Weapons) nuclear weapons in Syria has come to light. Experts say the proof is irrefutable.

Dramatic video footage from Syria has revealed startling evidence that counters Israel’s claims of “surgical strikes” on weapons headed to Lebanon.

What were said to be air strikes is now proven to have actually been artillery, something easily discernible to even an untrained observer.

What happens next is shocking. While artillery shells rain down on Syrian army positions, mobile Israeli artillery in direct support and even accompanying rebel forces inside Syria, a huge explosion occurs.

After analysis, it had become clear, Syria had come under attack by Israel using, not just nuclear weapons, but an American nuclear bunker buster bomb, one of several supplied to Israel to use against Iran, one of the last acts of the Bush/Cheney administration.

Submitted for analysis, the footage was compared with tests of the 37,000-pound MOB (Massive Ordnance Penetrator), designed by Boeing to be used against Iran’s underground facilities. There was no similarity whatsoever noted between the Syrian “event” and a conventional “bunker buster”

More here: http://beforeitsnews.com/eu/2013/05/details-of-israels-nuclear-weapon-used-on-syria-emerge-2520436.html

 

Advertisements

There’s more going on with this than meets the eyes. With the economy in the brink and unlimited QE3 about to happen, it seems theres something nasty on the wind. 

 

Such a FUSS over a silly anti-Islam movie!

As I type these words, riots have erupted all across the middle east. Protesters attacked the US Consulate in Benghazi and killed the US Ambassador. In Cairo, protesters have surrounded the US Embassy and chant for the Americans to get out. In Iraq, Yemen, and a dozen other nations, the same is happening.

The consistent theme in all these protests is that America must leave.

The US corporate media tells a different tale. According to ABCNNBBCBSFOX, all this anger is over a silly little movie bashing Mohammed. The film, produced by An Israeli with Jewish donors a Coptic Christian (to get Israel off of the hook) a CIA/Mossad asset  who the heck knows, was intentionally created to be as offensive as possible to Muslims. The fact that it was a contrived piece of propaganda from the start is obvious. The entire cast and crew has gone public saying they were duped into making the film, with its offensive content added in during post production. In Hollywood, the normal behavior is to have ones name on everything one works on. That this film’s producer worked so hard to keep himself hidden betrays the propaganda agenda.

But the American corporate media is trying to sell a message that all Muslims hate Americans without a good reason; that the riots are solely over this film, and since those eeeeeeviilllllll mooooooslims don’t respect the First Amendment right to free speech, real patriotic Americans should believe that the Muslims have over-reacted.

But the rage seen across the mideast has very little to do with the film. They don’t hate us for our freedoms, or for our religion. Those people in the nations invaded and subverted by the United States through a decade of overt and covert wars on behalf of Israel hate America because every time they see their friends and neighbors blown to bloody bits before their eyes, the shrapnel is stamped, “Made in the USA.”

Do the citizens of those invaded nations have reason to hate America, other than that silly little film?

Well, yes, they do.

So, you think all that anger and rage is just because of a provocative movie?

If what you see above was being done to your family and friends, how would you feel?

That is how they feel. Their countries have been invaded on the basis of lies, their government subverted to serve foreign interests, their women and children killed, their places of worship bombed, their cultural history buried under rubble.

So why the big lie on American TV that this is all about a movie? To obscure the reality of what these invaded people have suffered at the hands of America by trivialities their rage. To demonize the Muslims by making their anger seem entirely out of proportion and unreasonable.

To ignite a wider war.

In the months before 9-11, there was a sudden surge of embassy attacks, all blamed on Osama Bin Laden. Those embassy attacks were the “warm up”, a pre-sell of the idea that America was under threat from “Radical Islam” to prepare them mentally to believe the official story when 9-11 itself finally happened. And I greatly fear we may be seeing a repeat of this tactic.

For months, Netanyahu has been pushing for the United States to commit to as war with Iran, before Israel’s elections in October. President Obama, knowing that Americans are weary of wars on Israel’s enemies, wants to wait until after the November elections in the US. That Netanyahu cannot do, as absent a war to wave at the Israeli voters, the Likud party may well lose to the Kadima party, which means a pink slip for Netanyahu.

Netanyahu is in a corner, and desperate. His only remaining option is a new false-flag attack to be blamed on Iran, something spectacular enough to “motivate” the American people to throw their children onto the Iranian bayonets, something that will trick Americans into supporting Obama when he joins Israel’s attack on Iran. Lastly, a spectacular false-flag attack, blamed on Iran, would undermine the Russian and Chinese commitments to defend Iran if Israel and the US attacks. If it is all “Iran’s fault” in the eyes of their citizens, Russia and China may have to back down.

False-flag attacks are nothing new. The Lavon Affair was a classic example. So was the attack on the USS Liberty. So was 9-11.

So what is Netanyahu considering? Obviously if it involves a nuclear weapon, Netanyahu can say that it proves he was right all along that Iran is a dangerous nuclear threat. Where will that nuke be detonated? Opinions vary, from the Golden Gate bridge to the aging and about-to-be-retired USS Enterprise. But given that Israel obtained their first weapons-grade fissionables here in the United States, the possability that they already have a bomb inside our borders cannot be ruled out.

But of one thing I am certain. This current provocation of anger across the Middle East could well be the warm up to Israel’s final push to trick the stupid Muslims and stupid Christians into killing each other off.

Please, don’t be stupid.

UPDATE: The Christian Science Monitor is reporting that aside from the 14 minute clip posted to the internet, this supposed Mohammed-bashing movie does not seem to exist. Supporting the theory that this is a propaganda hoax, and given the statements made by the cast and crew that they were unaware that the movie they were hired to make was so imflammatory, it now appears that someone took the footage from the movie that was being made, “Desert Warrior” and repurposed it for this 14 minute clip. But there is no actual movie.

Origianlly posted at: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/suchafuss.php

It seems VT is split on the issue but, what ever happened to candles & wood for heat & cooking. OH, thats right, I “need” Internet and the History channel.

 

Cassandra Anderson
Activist Post 

Recently a federal judge blocked Vermont from decommissioning the leaky Yankee nuclear reactor that is almost identical to Fukushima Reactor #1 (75% of US reactors are leaking radioactive material), using the excuse that only the corrupt federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) can decommission a reactor. 

WRONG!

Under the Tenth Amendment States’ Rights, states can do anything they want as long as it is not a power that is:

•  delegated to the federal government in the Constitution
•  prohibited to the states by the Constitution
•  prohibited to the state by its own constitution

The Constitution lacks provisions forcing a state to risk its citizens’ lives in order to boost nuclear industry profits.

Constitutional Remedies
Vermont has a law that gives the state veto power over a reactor when its license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is expired.  The judge in the Yankee case unconstitutionally invalidated the state law, and the NRC granted the Yankee plant a 20-year extension.  An appeal of the ruling would require a lot of time and effort.
A quick and simple option for Vermont would be to collect evidence proving leakage that endangers health or property in order to declare a State of Emergency that would put control over Yankee operations in the hands of the state.  It is unlikely that Vermont could decommission the reactor, but they could close it down until the necessary repairs were completed.  If the repairs were cost prohibitive, the effect would be to shut it down.
Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin’s War on Climate
Because the Yankee nuclear plant provides 70% of Vermont’s energy, a replacement energy source is required if Yankee were to close.  Governor Shumlin favors green renewable energy that is insufficient, unreliable and very costly.  Shumlin’s energy plan is centered on the pipe dream of renewables providing 90% of electricity needs by 2050.  Coal is discounted in his fairy tale paradigm.
Governor Shumlin is either a global warming hoax sucker, or a globalist puppet intent on implementing UN Agenda 21 slavery through oppressive energy regulations that include cap-and-trade taxes.  The only way that renewables can become cost effective is to raise the price of the competition through carbon taxes (the objective of this program is to eliminate the competition).
 
The state of Vermont has played into UN Agenda 21 tyranny by signing on to an unconstitutional treaty between states, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, that implemented a mandatory cap-and-trade tax scheme in 2008.

Energy Options

Governor Shumlin shuns fracked natural gas because he doesn’t believe there is a big enough supply of it in Vermont (no mention of potential groundwater pollution and the undisclosed ingredients).
 

 

Friday, January 6th, 2012 | Posted by

Behind the Deepening Crisis with Iran: the Real Story Versus the Cover Story

 
Around a third of all oil shipped in tankers passes through the strait, and if this supply were disrupted it would out immense pressure on the rest of the world’s supplies.

by Mark H Gaffney

 

Recently, President Obama imposed new sanctions on Iran which according to reports have been very effective, causing a sudden major devaluation of Iran’s currency. The Iranians correctly understand that they are under attack, and have threatened to respond by closing the strait of Hormuz, through which a large percentage of oil from the Mideast flows to the global economy. If the crisis deepens and Iran makes good on its threat to close Hormuz, there is little doubt that the US will intervene to reopen the strait. This will lead to a shooting war for which Iran will be blamed, even though the recent US sanctions were tantamount to overt aggression.

Ed Note: George Galloway vs. the warmonger parrot who is very similar to US Republican right wing zealots including Presidential contenders:

I believe the US will exploit the situation to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities. But, even more importantly, the US will target Iran’s conventional missiles. Indeed, I believe this is the real reason for US sanctions in the first place, and for the buildup of tensions in recent days. Despite public perceptions, and all the rhetoric about nukes, the present crisis has nothing to do with Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons program. In my opinion, that is just a cover story. 

The real issue is the fact that Iran has upgraded its medium range conventionally-armed missiles with GPS technology, making its missiles much more accurate. This means Iran can now target Israel’s own nuclear, bio and chemical weapons stockpiles, located inside Israel, as well as the Dimona nuclear reactor. 

In short, Iran has achieved a conventional deterrent to Israel. Therefore, statements by Iranian officials that Iran has no nuclear weapons program are in my view probably correct. Presently, Iran does not need nukes to deter Israel. It can do so with its GPS-guided medium range missiles. The Israelis are no doubt gnashing their teeth over this, because they now find themselves threatened by their own WMD stockpiles, and by their own nuclear reactors, especially Dimona, all of which have become targets.

A few direct hits by Iran could cause a toxic plume, killing thousands of Israelis. A worst case might signal the end of the Jewish state.

It is important to realize that Iran would never launch a pre-emptive strike on Israel because the Iranians know that the US/Israeli response would be devastating. However, if Iran comes clickunder attack first, all bets are off. Iran will defend itself. A counter attack on Israel cannot be ruled out because Iranian leaders understand clearly (even if the American people do not) that the crisis has been manufactured, on Israel’s behalf.

From the Israeli standpoint, the present Iranian deterrent (though conventional) is simply unacceptable. Israel’s military strategists have always insisted on total freedom of movement. This is why Israel refused a US offer many years ago to sign a defense pact with the US. Such a treaty would have limited Israel’s freedom of movement, and this was unacceptable. Israel’s leaders preferred to remain independent. Israel has always insisted on the “freedom” to intimidate its neighbors, whenever and howsoever it chooses. Iran’s conventional missiles now curtail that “freedom.” Israeli officials probably worry, for example, that Iran’s conventional missiles would limit its freedom to attack Hezbollah in Lebanon, in a future conflict. Hezbollah is closely allied with Tehran.

I believe the present crisis has been manufactured to create the pretext for a US air campaign to take out Iran’s conventional missile sites. The US will also target Iran’s nuclear facilities, but the primary target will be Iran’s conventional missiles. The US will be doing Israel’s bidding. The Zionist tail will be wagging the servile US dog.

Obviously, you can’t generate public support for such a bombing campaign, on Israel’s behalf. Hence the cover story about nukes and the alleged Iranian threat to wipe Israel off the map, all of which is untrue but very effective propaganda nonetheless.

The problem for the US is that depriving Iran of its conventional deterrent will not be easy to accomplish. Indeed, it will be even more difficult than taking out all of Iran’s nuclear facilities. Iran’s conventional missiles are probably dispersed widely. If they come under attack, the purpose of the air campaign will be transparently obvious to the Iranian leadership. Faced with the prospect of losing their deterrent, the Mullahs may well decide to fire their conventional missiles. If they do and manage some direct hits on Israel’s nuclear-bio-and chemical weapons stockpiles, the ensuing disaster will prompt an Israeli response. Israel may even resort to the Samson Option, and attack Iran with nukes. Words cannot describe the horrific scale of such an outcome. Unfortunately, it is all too possible.

Early in the war, US naval forces in the Gulf will also come under attack. No mistake, Iran has enough anti-ship cruise missiles to pose a grave threat to the US naval presence in the Gulf. Thousands of US sailors are now in harm’s way, and at risk.

We must rally to prevent such a war. Peace activists must now marshal every asset for peace that we possess. The American people need to know the truth. This is a phony crisis. Yet the danger is very real. Now is the time to speak out with all of our strength. Tomorrow could come too late.


Mark H. Gaffney is an environmentalist, peace activist, researcher, and the author of The First Tree of the Day; Gnostic Secrets of the Naassenes and Dimona, the Third Temple? His articles and essays have appeared in numerous journals, magazines, and newspapers. He lives in Chiloquin, Oregon.